share_log

Institutional Investors Control 48% of PubMatic, Inc. (NASDAQ:PUBM) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 7.0%

Institutional Investors Control 48% of PubMatic, Inc. (NASDAQ:PUBM) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 7.0%

機構投資者控制了PubMatic, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:PUBM)48%的股份,並在股票上漲7.0%後於上週獲得了回報
Simply Wall St ·  05/08 11:09

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies PubMatic's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 16 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 高機構所有權意味着PubMatic的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 前16名股東擁有公司50%的股份
  • 業內人士最近賣出了

A look at the shareholders of PubMatic, Inc. (NASDAQ:PUBM) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 48% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看PubMatic, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:PUBM)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有48%所有權的機構。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$79m in market cap last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 90% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

在上週該公司的市值上漲了7900萬美元之後,機構投資者的情況正在好轉。目前,一年股東回報率爲90%,上週的漲幅錦上添花。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of PubMatic.

在下圖中,我們放大了PubMatic的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGM:PUBM Ownership Breakdown May 8th 2024
納斯達克通用汽車公司:PUBM 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 8 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About PubMatic?

關於PubMatic,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in PubMatic. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of PubMatic, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所見,機構投資者在PubMatic中擁有相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下PubMatic過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGM:PUBM Earnings and Revenue Growth May 8th 2024
納斯達克通用汽車公司:PUBM 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 8 日

PubMatic is not owned by hedge funds. From our data, we infer that the largest shareholder is Amar Goel (who also holds the title of Top Key Executive) with 8.5% of shares outstanding. Its usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider play the role of a key stakeholder. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.5% and 7.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Rajeev Goel directly holds 5.5% of the total shares outstanding.

PubMatic 不歸對沖基金所有。根據我們的數據,我們推斷出最大股東是阿馬爾·戈爾(他還擁有最高關鍵高管的頭銜),已發行股份的8.5%。當內部人士擁有公司大量股份時,這通常被認爲是一個好兆頭,在這種情況下,我們很高興看到公司內部人士扮演關鍵利益相關者的角色。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的8.5%和7.0%。此外,該公司首席執行官拉傑夫·戈爾直接持有已發行股份總額的5.5%。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 16 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

從股東登記冊來看,我們可以看到50%的所有權由前16名股東控制,這意味着沒有一個股東擁有所有權的多數股東。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of PubMatic

PubMatic 的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of PubMatic, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.2b, and insiders have US$210m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

看來內部人士擁有PubMatic, Inc.的很大一部分股份。它的市值僅爲12億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值2.1億美元的股票。這非常重要。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您不妨訪問這張顯示內部人士近期交易的免費圖表。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 35% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over PubMatic. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

PubMatic擁有35%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對PubMatic有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for PubMatic you should be aware of.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。一個很好的例子:我們發現了你應該注意的PubMatic的1個警告信號。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論