share_log

Textron Inc. (NYSE:TXT) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 87% of the Company

Textron Inc. (NYSE:TXT) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 87% of the Company

德事隆公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:TXT)受到持有公司87%股份的機構所有者的青睞
Simply Wall St ·  04/08 11:39

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Textron's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 高機構所有權意味着德事隆的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 共有10名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%
  • 分析師的預測以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有深刻的了解

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Textron Inc. (NYSE:TXT), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 87% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解誰真正控制了德事隆公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:TXT),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有87%所有權的機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者而言。因此,向公司投資的大量機構資金通常被視爲積極屬性。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Textron.

在下圖中,我們放大了德事隆的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:TXT Ownership Breakdown April 8th 2024
紐約證券交易所:TXT 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 8 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Textron?

關於德事隆,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Textron. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Textron's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如您所見,機構投資者持有德事隆的大量股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看德事隆的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:TXT Earnings and Revenue Growth April 8th 2024
紐約證券交易所:TXT 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 8 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Textron. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 9.4% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 8.7% of the company stock.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對德事隆進行有意義的投資。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份的12%。T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.是第二大股東,擁有9.4%的普通股,貝萊德公司持有該公司約8.7%的股份。

We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們做了進一步的挖掘,發現10位大股東約佔登記冊的51%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Textron

德事隆的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Textron Inc. in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$90m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的數據表明,內部人士以自己的名義擁有德事隆公司不到1%的股份。這是一家非常大的公司,因此看到內部人士擁有該公司的很大一部分股份會令人驚訝。儘管他們的持股量不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共擁有價值9000萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。看到至少有一部分內部所有權總是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Textron. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

德事隆擁有13%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對德事隆有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Textron better, we need to consider many other factors.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解德事隆,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜歡更深入地了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以在這張詳細圖表中找到歷史收入和收入。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論