share_log

Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:HOOD) Institutional Investors Lost 5.2% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Robinhood Markets, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:HOOD) Institutional Investors Lost 5.2% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Robinhood Markets, Inc. 's(納斯達克股票代碼:HOOD)機構投資者上週下跌5.2%,但受益於長期漲勢
Simply Wall St ·  04/08 11:45

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Robinhood Markets' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 高機構所有權意味着Robinhood Markets的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 共有10位投資者持有該公司的多數股權,擁有52%的所有權
  • 內部人士最近的銷售情況

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ:HOOD), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 50% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解誰真正控制了Robinhood Markets, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:HOOD),了解該業務的所有權結構很重要。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有50%所有權的機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 5.2% in value last week. However, the 84% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

沒有股東喜歡在投資中蒙受損失,尤其是上週持股價值下降5.2%的機構投資者。但是,84%的股東一年回報率可能有助於減輕他們的痛苦。但是,我們假設他們將來會注意弱點。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Robinhood Markets.

在下圖中,我們放大了羅賓漢市場的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:HOOD Ownership Breakdown April 8th 2024
NASDAQGS:HOOD 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 8 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Robinhood Markets?

關於羅賓漢市場,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

Robinhood Markets already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Robinhood Markets, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

羅賓漢市場已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下Robinhood Markets過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:HOOD Earnings and Revenue Growth April 8th 2024
NASDAQGS: HOOD 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 8 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Robinhood Markets is not owned by hedge funds. Our data suggests that Baiju Bhatt, who is also the company's Top Key Executive, holds the most number of shares at 7.6%. When an insider holds a sizeable amount of a company's stock, investors consider it as a positive sign because it suggests that insiders are willing to have their wealth tied up in the future of the company. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.8% and 6.8% of the stock. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Vladimir Tenev is also a Chairman of the Board, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。羅賓漢市場不歸對沖基金所有。我們的數據顯示,同時也是該公司最高主要高管的百居·巴特持有的股票數量最多,爲7.6%。當內部人士持有公司大量股票時,投資者認爲這是一個積極的信號,因爲這表明內部人士願意將自己的財富綁定在公司的未來中。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約6.8%和6.8%的股份。有趣的是,第三大股東弗拉基米爾·特內夫也是董事會主席,這再次表明該公司最大股東擁有強大的內部所有權。

We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 52% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進行了進一步的挖掘,發現10名頂級股東約佔登記冊的52%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,因此在某種程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Robinhood Markets

羅賓漢市場的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Robinhood Markets, Inc.. Insiders own US$2.4b worth of shares in the US$16b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有Robinhood Markets, Inc.的大量股份。內部人士擁有這家價值160億美元的公司價值24億美元的股份。這很有意義。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您不妨訪問這張顯示內部人士近期交易的免費圖表。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 22% stake in Robinhood Markets. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有羅賓漢市場22%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With an ownership of 13%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股權公司擁有13%的所有權,可以在制定以價值創造爲重點的公司戰略方面發揮作用。一些投資者可能會爲此感到鼓舞,因爲私募股權有時能夠鼓勵制定有助於市場看到公司價值的策略。或者,這些持有人可能會在投資上市後退出投資。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Robinhood Markets that you should be aware of before investing here.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,我們發現了Robinhood Markets的1個警告信號,在這裏投資之前,您應該注意這一點。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論