share_log

Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After Corsair Gaming, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CRSR) Latest 5.1% Drop Adds to a Year Losses

Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After Corsair Gaming, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CRSR) Latest 5.1% Drop Adds to a Year Losses

在Corsair Gaming, Inc.之後,機構投資者可能會採取嚴厲措施。”s(納斯達克股票代碼:CRSR)最近5.1%的跌幅增加了一年的虧損
Simply Wall St ·  03/06 05:30

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Corsair Gaming's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • Wasserstein & Co., L.P. owns 54% of the company
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 高機構所有權意味着Corsair Gaming的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • Wasserstein & Co., L.P. 擁有該公司54%的股份
  • 所有權研究以及分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票的機會

Every investor in Corsair Gaming, Inc. (NASDAQ:CRSR) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 80% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Corsair Gaming, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:CRSR)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。持有公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲80%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 5.1% last week. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 26% for shareholders. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell Corsair Gaming which might hurt individual investors.

上週,機構投資者的持股價值下降了5.1%。這組投資者可能特別擔心當前的虧損,這使股東一年的虧損增加了26%。也被稱爲 “智能貨幣”,機構對股票價格的走勢有很大的影響力。因此,如果繼續下跌,機構投資者可能會被迫出售Corsair Gaming,這可能會傷害個人投資者。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Corsair Gaming, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Corsair Gaming的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:CRSR Ownership Breakdown March 6th 2024
納斯達克GS:CRSR 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 6 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Corsair Gaming?

關於Corsair Gaming,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

Corsair Gaming already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Corsair Gaming, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Corsair Gaming已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下Corsair Gaming過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:CRSR Earnings and Revenue Growth March 6th 2024
納斯達克GS:CRSR 收益和收入增長 2024 年 3 月 6 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Corsair Gaming is not owned by hedge funds. Wasserstein & Co., L.P. is currently the largest shareholder, with 54% of shares outstanding. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 6.4% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 5.2% of the company stock. In addition, we found that Andrew Paul, the CEO has 2.6% of the shares allocated to their name.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。Corsair Gaming不歸對沖基金所有。Wasserstein & Co., L.P. 目前是最大股東,已發行股份的54%。由於所有權持有如此巨額的股份,我們推斷他們對公司的未來擁有重大控制權。貝萊德公司是第二大股東,擁有6.4%的普通股,Vanguard Group, Inc.持有該公司約5.2%的股份。此外,我們發現首席執行官安德魯·保羅以其名義分配了2.6%的股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Corsair Gaming

Corsair Gaming 的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Corsair Gaming, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$41m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有Corsair Gaming, Inc.的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些可能有意義的調整通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約4100萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。儘管如此,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 16% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司16%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Corsair Gaming better, we need to consider many other factors.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解Corsair Gaming,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜歡更深入地了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以在這張詳細圖表中找到歷史收入和收入。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論