share_log

Meta's Chief AI Scientist Clashes With Early OpenAI Investor Vinod Khosla: 'Clearly...Can Profit Financially From A Closed Source Approach To AI'

Meta's Chief AI Scientist Clashes With Early OpenAI Investor Vinod Khosla: 'Clearly...Can Profit Financially From A Closed Source Approach To AI'

Meta 的首席人工智能科學家與早期的 OpenAI 投資者維諾德·科斯拉發生衝突:“顯然... 可以從封閉源的人工智能方法中獲利”
Benzinga ·  05/13 05:09

Meta Platforms Inc.'s (NASDAQ:META) Chief AI Scientist, Yann LeCun, took to X, formerly Twitter, expressing his disagreement with OpenAI's early investor, Vinod Khosla.

Meta Platforms Inc. 's(納斯達克股票代碼:META)首席人工智能科學家亞恩·勒昆在X(前推特)上表示不同意OpenAI的早期投資者維諾德·科斯拉。

What Happened: LeCun thinks that Khosla is a proponent of closed-source AI due to his financial motivations.

發生了什麼:LeCun認爲科斯拉之所以支持閉源人工智能,是因爲他的經濟動機。

"Clearly @vkhosla can profit financially from a closed approach to AI."

“顯然,@vkhosla 可以從封閉的人工智能方法中獲利。”

Khosla Ventures, founded by Vinod Khosla, is the first venture capital investor of OpenAI. In 2019, Khosla invested $50 million in OpenAI, making his largest bet by far in his 40-year history.

由維諾德·科斯拉創立的科斯拉風險投資公司是OpenAI的第一位風險投資者。2019年,科斯拉向OpenAI投資了5000萬美元,這是他40年曆史上迄今爲止最大的賭注。

But LeCun thinks it's not just the financial factor that is behind Khosla's support for closed source AI. He thinks the China threat is playing a role, too.

但是 LeCun 認爲,科斯拉支持閉源人工智能的不僅僅是財務因素。他認爲中國的威脅也在起作用。

"But I don't think that his main reason to oppose open source frontier models. He is genuinely worried about China getting its hands on it," LeCun said.

“但我不認爲這是他反對開源前沿模式的主要原因。他真的很擔心中國會拿到它,” LeCun說。

However, he thinks Khosla's China concerns are "misguided."

但是,他認爲科斯拉對中國的擔憂 “被誤導了”。

He argues that Chinese AI scientists and engineers are talented and capable of innovating independently. LeCun also highlights that the Chinese government is more worried about losing control of AI technology than their counterparts in liberal democracies.

他認爲,中國的人工智能科學家和工程師才華橫溢,能夠獨立創新。LeCun 還強調,與自由民主國家的同行相比,中國政府更擔心失去對人工智能技術的控制。

LeCun, who has been a vocal supporter of open-source AI, thinks these platforms are essential for a diverse and democratic future, where everyone has access to a wide variety of AI assistants.

LeCun 一直是開源人工智能的堅定支持者,他認爲這些平台對於多元化和民主的未來至關重要,在這種未來中,每個人都可以使用各種各樣的人工智能助手。

"That future can *only* come about through open source AI platforms enabling a large diversity of fine-tuned systems."

“未來只能*通過開源人工智能平台實現,支持大量微調系統。”

Clearly @vkhosla can profit financially from a closed approach to AI.
But I don't think that his main reason to oppose open source frontier models.
He is genuinely worried about China getting its hands on it.
That worry is misguided.
First, Chinese AI scientists and engineers...

— Yann LeCun (@ylecun) May 12, 2024

顯然,@vkhosla 可以從封閉的人工智能方法中獲利。
但我並不認爲這是他反對開源前沿模式的主要原因。
他真的很擔心中國會拿到它。
這種擔憂是錯誤的。
首先,中國的人工智能科學家和工程師...

— Yann LeCun (@ylecun) 2024 年 5 月 12 日

Why It Matters: LeCun's comments come amid a global debate about the regulation and access to AI technology. Khosla, an early investor in Microsoft Corp.-backed OpenAI, has been vocal about the need to protect AI technology for national security reasons.

爲何重要:LeCun的評論是在關於人工智能技術監管和准入的全球辯論中發表的。科斯拉是微軟公司支持的OpenAI的早期投資者,他一直在大聲疾呼出於國家安全原因需要保護人工智能技術。

He has clashed with other tech leaders, such as Marc Andreessen, over the open-sourcing of critical technologies like AI.

他曾就人工智能等關鍵技術的開源問題與馬克·安德森等其他科技領袖發生過沖突。

Meanwhile, LeCun has been a strong advocate for open-source AI models, believing that they will one day overtake closed-source rivals.

同時,LeCun 一直是開源人工智能模型的堅定倡導者,相信它們有朝一日會超越閉源競爭對手。

His recent comments suggest a fundamental disagreement about the future of AI technology and its implications for global power dynamics.

他最近的評論表明,在人工智能技術的未來及其對全球力量動力學的影響方面存在根本分歧。

Meanwhile, Destiny Tech100 Inc. fund (NYSE:DXYZ), which focuses on investing in private high-growth tech companies such as SpaceX and OpenAI, has fallen by 60.82% in the past month, according to Benzinga Pro.

同時,根據Benzinga Pro的數據,專注於投資SpaceX和OpenAI等私人高增長科技公司的Destiny Tech100 Inc.基金(紐約證券交易所代碼:DXYZ)在過去一個月中下跌了60.82%。

Check out more of Benzinga's Consumer Tech coverage by following this link.

點擊此鏈接,查看Benzinga對消費科技的更多報道。

Disclaimer: This content was partially produced with the help of Benzinga Neuro and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors.

免責聲明:此內容部分是在Benzinga Neuro的幫助下製作的,並由Benzinga編輯審查和發佈。

Photos courtesy: Wikimedia and Flickr

照片由維基媒體和Flickr提供

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論