share_log

China Vered Financial Holding Corporation Limited's (HKG:245) Last Week's 22% Decline Must Have Disappointed Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake

China Vered Financial Holding Corporation Limited's (HKG:245) Last Week's 22% Decline Must Have Disappointed Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake

中國維德金融控股有限公司(HKG: 245)上週下跌22%一定讓持有大量股份的散戶投資者失望
Simply Wall St ·  05/10 19:33

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over China Vered Financial Holding by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 54% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
  • Insiders own 26% of China Vered Financial Holding
  • 散戶投資者對China Vered Financial Holding的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 54% 的業務由前三名股東持有
  • 業內人士持有中維金融控股26%的股份

A look at the shareholders of China Vered Financial Holding Corporation Limited (HKG:245) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 35% to be precise, is retail investors. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看中維金融控股有限公司(HKG: 245)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。持有該公司股份最多的集團是散戶投資者,準確地說約爲35%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

As market cap fell to HK$2.0b last week, retail investors would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.

隨着上週市值跌至20億港元,散戶投資者面臨的損失將超過該公司任何其他股東群體。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of China Vered Financial Holding.

在下圖中,我們放大了China Vered Financial Holding的不同所有權集團。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:245 Ownership Breakdown May 10th 2024
SEHK: 245 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 10 日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About China Vered Financial Holding?

關於China Vered金融控股,缺乏機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.

交易不太活躍的小公司通常缺少機構投資者,但是沒有機構投資者的大公司並不常見。

There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. China Vered Financial Holding might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.

機構爲何不擁有股票,有多種解釋。最常見的情況是,公司相對於所管理的資金來說規模太小,因此該機構不願仔細研究該公司。或者,該公司的某些方面可能使機構投資者望而卻步。China Vered Financial Holding可能沒有機構想要的那種過去的業績,或者他們可能根本沒有仔細研究該業務。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:245 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 10th 2024
SEHK: 245 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 10 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in China Vered Financial Holding. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Vered Holdings Group Ltd with 29% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 15% and 10% of the stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Feng Li directly holds 0.8% of the total shares outstanding.

對沖基金在中國維德金融控股的股份不多。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是Vered Holdings Group Ltd,已發行股份的29%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約15%和10%的股份。此外,該公司首席執行官李峯直接持有已發行股份總額的0.8%。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前三名股東擁有公司的多數股權,這意味着他們足夠強大,足以影響公司的決策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。我們的信息表明,分析師對該股沒有任何報道,因此可能鮮爲人知。

Insider Ownership Of China Vered Financial Holding

中維金融控股的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in China Vered Financial Holding Corporation Limited. Insiders have a HK$528m stake in this HK$2.0b business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有中國維德金融控股有限公司的大量股份。內部人士在這項20億港元的業務中持有5.28億港元的股份。我們可以說這表明了與股東的一致性,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然很小;一些內部人士可能已經創立了該公司。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 35% stake in China Vered Financial Holding. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有中國維德金融控股35%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

Private equity firms hold a 10% stake in China Vered Financial Holding. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股權公司持有中國維德金融控股10%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。有時我們會看到私募股權長期存在,但總的來說,它們的投資期限較短,而且顧名思義,對上市公司的投資並不多。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售資本並將其重新部署到其他地方。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 29%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有該公司29%的股份。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司有興趣,則應在年度報告中予以披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with China Vered Financial Holding (including 1 which is concerning) .

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,你應該了解我們在China Vered Financial Holding身上發現的兩個警告信號(包括一個令人擔憂的信號)。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

當然,這可能不是最值得買入的股票。因此,您可能希望看到我們免費收集的具有良好財務狀況的有趣潛在客戶。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論