share_log

Individual Investors Who Hold 42% of BRC Inc. (NYSE:BRCC) Gained 51%, Institutions Profited as Well

Individual Investors Who Hold 42% of BRC Inc. (NYSE:BRCC) Gained 51%, Institutions Profited as Well

持有BRC Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:BRCC)42%股份的個人投資者上漲了51%,機構也獲利
Simply Wall St ·  05/10 10:57

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • BRC's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • The top 14 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Institutions own 35% of BRC
  • BRC擁有大量的個人投資者所有權,這表明關鍵決策受到廣大公衆股東的影響
  • 前14名股東擁有公司50%的股份
  • 機構擁有 BRC 35% 的股份

If you want to know who really controls BRC Inc. (NYSE:BRCC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 42% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着BRC Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:BRCC),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。個人投資者擁有42%的股份,擁有公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

While individual investors were the group that benefitted the most from last week's US$125m market cap gain, institutions too had a 35% share in those profits.

儘管個人投資者是上週1.25億美元市值增長中受益最大的群體,但機構在這些利潤中也佔有35%的份額。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about BRC.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於BRC的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:BRCC Ownership Breakdown May 10th 2024
紐約證券交易所:BRCC 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 10 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About BRC?

關於BRC,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

BRC already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at BRC's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

BRC已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看BRC的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:BRCC Earnings and Revenue Growth May 10th 2024
紐約證券交易所:BRCC收益和收入增長 2024年5月10日

It would appear that 19% of BRC shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Engaged Capital, LLC is currently the company's largest shareholder with 19% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.3% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.5% by the third-largest shareholder.

看來BRC的19%的股票是由對沖基金控制的。這值得注意,因爲對沖基金通常是非常活躍的投資者,他們可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期內看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。Engaged Capital, LLC目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份爲19%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約6.3%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有4.5%的所有權。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 14 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔細觀察我們的所有權數據就會發現,前14名股東的總所有權爲50%,這意味着沒有一個股東擁有多數股權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of BRC

BRC 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can report that insiders do own shares in BRC Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$901m, and insiders have US$33m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有BRC Inc.的股份。它的市值僅爲9.01億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值3300萬美元的股票。這至少顯示出一定的對齊性。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 42% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over BRC. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有42%的所有權的公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對BRC有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand BRC better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for BRC that you should be aware of.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解BRC,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經確定了您應該注意的3個BRC警告信號。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論