share_log

Private Companies Who Own 48% Along With Institutions Invested in VEON Ltd. (NASDAQ:VEON) Saw Increase in Their Holdings Value Last Week

Private Companies Who Own 48% Along With Institutions Invested in VEON Ltd. (NASDAQ:VEON) Saw Increase in Their Holdings Value Last Week

持有48%的私營公司以及投資VEON有限公司(納斯達克股票代碼:VEON)的機構上週的持股價值均有所增加
Simply Wall St ·  05/03 10:07

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over VEON by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 56% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • 20% of VEON is held by Institutions
  • 私營公司對VEON的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 56% 的業務由前兩名股東持有
  • VEON 20% 的股份由機構持有

A look at the shareholders of VEON Ltd. (NASDAQ:VEON) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 48% to be precise, is private companies. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看VEON Ltd.(納斯達克股票代碼:VEON)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。持有該公司股份最多的集團是私營公司,準確地說約爲48%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Private companies gained the most after market cap touched US$1.7b last week, while institutions who own 20% also benefitted.

上週市值觸及17億美元后,私營公司漲幅最大,而持有20%的機構也從中受益。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about VEON.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於VEON的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:VEON Ownership Breakdown May 3rd 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:VEON 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 3 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About VEON?

關於VEON,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in VEON. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see VEON's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如您所見,機構投資者在VEON中擁有相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到VEON的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事中總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:VEON Earnings and Revenue Growth May 3rd 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:VEON 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 3 日

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 12% of VEON. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Our data shows that L1T VIP Holdings S.a.r.l. is the largest shareholder with 48% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.3% and 7.6% of the stock.

我們的數據表明,對沖基金擁有VEON12%的股份。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可以非常活躍和活躍。許多人正在尋找推動股價上漲的中期催化劑。我們的數據顯示,L1T VIP Holdings S.a.r.l. 是最大股東,已發行股份爲48%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約8.3%和7.6%的股份。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前兩名股東擁有公司的多數股權,這意味着他們足夠強大,足以影響公司的決策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。分析師對該股的報道很少,但報道不多。因此,它還有獲得更多報道的餘地。

Insider Ownership Of VEON

VEON 的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of VEON Ltd. in their own names. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$5.9m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的數據表明,內部人士以自己的名義擁有VEON Ltd.不到1%的股份。但是,我們確實注意到,內部人士有可能通過私營公司或其他公司結構獲得間接利益。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士擁有價值590萬美元的股票。絕對值可能比比例份額更重要。很高興看到董事會成員擁有股票,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 19% stake in VEON. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有VEON19%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 48%, of the VEON stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

私人公司似乎擁有VEON股票的48%。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過一家獨立的私人公司對上市公司的股份擁有權益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand VEON better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - VEON has 2 warning signs (and 1 which is concerning) we think you should know about.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地理解VEON,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。以風險爲例-VEON 有 2 個警告信號(其中 1 個令人擔憂),我們認爲您應該知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論