share_log

First Bancorp's (NASDAQ:FBNC) Market Cap Decline of US$69m May Not Have as Much of an Impact on Institutional Owners After a Year of 4.7% Returns

First Bancorp's (NASDAQ:FBNC) Market Cap Decline of US$69m May Not Have as Much of an Impact on Institutional Owners After a Year of 4.7% Returns

在經歷了4.7%的回報率之後,First Bancorp(納斯達克股票代碼:FBNC)市值下降了6900萬美元,對機構所有者的影響可能不會那麼大
Simply Wall St ·  04/29 08:04

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies First Bancorp's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 13 shareholders
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 高機構所有權意味着First Bancorp的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 50% 的業務由前 13 名股東持有
  • 業內人士最近一直在拋售

To get a sense of who is truly in control of First Bancorp (NASDAQ:FBNC), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 69% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制了第一銀行(納斯達克股票代碼:FBNC),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲69%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$69m last week. However, the 4.7% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

上週該公司的市值下降了6900萬美元后,機構投資者遭受了最大的損失。但是,4.7%的股東一年回報率可能減輕了打擊。但是,他們應該注意未來的進一步損失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of First Bancorp, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究First Bancorp的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:FBNC Ownership Breakdown April 29th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:FBNC 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 29 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About First Bancorp?

關於第一銀行,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that First Bancorp does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of First Bancorp, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,First Bancorp確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看First Bancorp過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:FBNC Earnings and Revenue Growth April 29th 2024
納斯達克GS:FBNC收益和收入增長 2024年4月29日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. First Bancorp is not owned by hedge funds. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 14% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.5% by the third-largest shareholder.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。第一銀行不歸對沖基金所有。貝萊德公司目前是最大股東,已發行股份的14%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約6.8%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有4.5%的所有權。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

在進一步挖掘之後,我們發現排名前13位的合計持有該公司的50%所有權,這表明沒有一個單一股東對公司擁有重要的控制權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of First Bancorp

First Bancorp的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行董事會成員的情況並不少見,特別是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

We can see that insiders own shares in First Bancorp. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$47m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以看到內部人士擁有第一銀行的股份。這是一家大公司,因此很高興看到這種一致性。內部人士擁有價值4700萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。如果您想探討內幕調整問題,可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 27% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over First Bancorp. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

First Bancorp擁有27%的所有權,公衆對First Bancorp擁有一定程度的影響力,主要是個人投資者。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand First Bancorp better, we need to consider many other factors.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解First Bancorp,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

許多人發現,深入了解一家公司過去的表現很有用。您可以訪問這張過去的收益、收入和現金流的詳細圖表。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論