share_log

Chubb Limited (NYSE:CB) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 86% of the Company

Chubb Limited (NYSE:CB) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 86% of the Company

安達有限公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:CB)受到持有公司86%股份的機構所有者的青睞
Simply Wall St ·  04/25 08:35

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Chubb's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 14 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 高機構所有權意味着安達的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 前14名股東擁有公司50%的股份
  • 業內人士最近一直在拋售

Every investor in Chubb Limited (NYSE:CB) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 86% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

安達有限公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:CB)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。機構擁有86%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由於機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者而言。因此,投資於公司的機構資金中有很大一部分通常是對公司未來的巨大信任票。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Chubb.

在下圖中,我們放大了安達的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:CB Ownership Breakdown April 25th 2024
紐約證券交易所:CB 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 25 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Chubb?

機構所有權告訴我們關於安達的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Chubb. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Chubb's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如您所見,機構投資者持有安達的相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們有時也會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到安達的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:CB Earnings and Revenue Growth April 25th 2024
紐約證券交易所:CB 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 25 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Chubb. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.6% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.3% of common stock, and Capital Research and Management Company holds about 5.7% of the company stock.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。對沖基金在安達的股票不多。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是最大股東,已發行股份的9.6%。貝萊德公司是第二大股東,擁有7.3%的普通股,資本研究與管理公司持有該公司約5.7%的股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 14 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔細觀察我們的所有權數據就會發現,前14名股東的總所有權爲50%,這意味着沒有一個股東擁有多數股權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Chubb

安達的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our information suggests that Chubb Limited insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$541m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的信息表明,安達有限公司內部人士擁有該公司不到1%的股份。由於它是一家大公司,我們只期望內部人士擁有其中的一小部分。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值5.41億美元的股票。看到董事會成員擁有股票是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司13%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Chubb is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。請注意,安達在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警告信號,您應該知道...

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論