share_log

Following a 14% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Avista Corporation (NYSE:AVA) Institutional Owners

Following a 14% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Avista Corporation (NYSE:AVA) Institutional Owners

繼去年下降14%之後,最近的漲勢可能會讓Avista公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:AVA)機構所有者感到高興
Simply Wall St ·  04/24 12:58

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Avista's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,Avista的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 52% 的業務由前八名股東持有
  • 分析師的預測以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有深刻的了解

Every investor in Avista Corporation (NYSE:AVA) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 86% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

阿維斯塔公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:AVA)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有86%所有權的機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

Last week's US$145m market cap gain would probably be appreciated by institutional investors, especially after a year of 14% losses.

機構投資者可能會對上週的1.45億美元市值收益表示讚賞,尤其是在經歷了14%的虧損之後。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Avista.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Avista的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:AVA Ownership Breakdown April 24th 2024
紐約證券交易所:AVA 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 24 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Avista?

關於Avista,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

Avista already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Avista's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

Avista已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Avista的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:AVA Earnings and Revenue Growth April 24th 2024
紐約證券交易所:AVA 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 24 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Avista. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 19% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 12% and 5.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對Avista進行有意義的投資。我們的數據顯示,貝萊德公司是最大股東,已發行股份的19%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的12%和5.9%。

We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 52% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進行了進一步的挖掘,發現8位大股東約佔登記冊的52%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,因此在某種程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Avista

Avista的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our information suggests that Avista Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$25m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的信息表明,阿維斯塔公司的內部人士擁有該公司不到1%的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此董事會成員有可能在不擁有太多比例權益的情況下擁有該公司的有意義的權益。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約2500萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。很高興看到董事會成員擁有股票,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in Avista. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Avista13%的股份。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Avista better, we need to consider many other factors. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Avista (of which 1 makes us a bit uncomfortable!) you should know about.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解Avista,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。比如風險。每家公司都有它們,我們發現了 Avista 的 3 個警告標誌(其中 1 個讓我們有點不舒服!)你應該知道。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論