share_log

Earnings Growth of 0.3% Over 5 Years Hasn't Been Enough to Translate Into Positive Returns for Las Vegas Sands (NYSE:LVS) Shareholders

Earnings Growth of 0.3% Over 5 Years Hasn't Been Enough to Translate Into Positive Returns for Las Vegas Sands (NYSE:LVS) Shareholders

5年內0.3%的收益增長不足以轉化爲拉斯維加斯金沙集團(紐約證券交易所代碼:LVS)股東的正回報
Simply Wall St ·  04/24 10:30

Ideally, your overall portfolio should beat the market average. But the main game is to find enough winners to more than offset the losers At this point some shareholders may be questioning their investment in Las Vegas Sands Corp. (NYSE:LVS), since the last five years saw the share price fall 32%. And we doubt long term believers are the only worried holders, since the stock price has declined 26% over the last twelve months. More recently, the share price has dropped a further 8.6% in a month. Importantly, this could be a market reaction to the recently released financial results. You can check out the latest numbers in our company report.

理想情況下,您的整體投資組合應超過市場平均水平。但主要的遊戲是找到足夠的贏家來抵消輸家。此時,一些股東可能會質疑他們對拉斯維加斯金沙集團(紐約證券交易所代碼:LVS)的投資,因爲過去五年股價下跌了32%。而且我們懷疑長期信徒是唯一擔心的持有者,因爲股價在過去十二個月中下跌了26%。最近,股價在一個月內又下跌了8.6%。重要的是,這可能是市場對最近公佈的財務業績的反應。你可以在我們的公司報告中查看最新的數字。

Given the past week has been tough on shareholders, let's investigate the fundamentals and see what we can learn.

鑑於過去一週對股東來說很艱難,讓我們調查一下基本面,看看我們能學到什麼。

While the efficient markets hypothesis continues to be taught by some, it has been proven that markets are over-reactive dynamic systems, and investors are not always rational. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.

儘管一些人繼續教導高效市場假說,但事實證明,市場是反應過度的動態系統,投資者並不總是理性的。評估公司情緒變化的一種有缺陷但合理的方法是將每股收益(EPS)與股價進行比較。

During five years of share price growth, Las Vegas Sands moved from a loss to profitability. That would generally be considered a positive, so we are surprised to see the share price is down. Other metrics might give us a better handle on how its value is changing over time.

在五年的股價增長中,拉斯維加斯金沙從虧損轉爲盈利。這通常會被視爲利好,因此我們驚訝地看到股價下跌。其他指標可能會讓我們更好地了解其價值如何隨着時間的推移而變化。

We don't think that the 1.7% is big factor in the share price, since it's quite small, as dividends go. Arguably, the revenue drop of 14% a year for half a decade suggests that the company can't grow in the long term. This has probably encouraged some shareholders to sell down the stock.

我們認爲1.7%不是影響股價的重要因素,因爲隨着股息的增加,它相當小。可以說,五年來每年收入下降14%,這表明該公司無法長期增長。這可能鼓勵了一些股東拋售該股。

The graphic below depicts how earnings and revenue have changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).

下圖描述了收入和收入隨時間推移而發生的變化(點擊圖片即可顯示確切的數值)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:LVS Earnings and Revenue Growth April 24th 2024
紐約證券交易所:LVS 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 24 日

Las Vegas Sands is well known by investors, and plenty of clever analysts have tried to predict the future profit levels. So we recommend checking out this free report showing consensus forecasts

拉斯維加斯金沙爲投資者所熟知,許多聰明的分析師都試圖預測未來的利潤水平。因此,我們建議您查看這份顯示共識預測的免費報告

What About Dividends?

分紅呢?

As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. We note that for Las Vegas Sands the TSR over the last 5 years was -27%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!

除了衡量股價回報率外,投資者還應考慮股東總回報率(TSR)。股東總回報率是一種回報計算方法,它考慮了現金分紅的價值(假設收到的任何股息都經過再投資)以及任何貼現資本籌集和分拆的計算價值。可以公平地說,股東總回報率爲支付股息的股票提供了更完整的畫面。我們注意到,拉斯維加斯金沙集團過去5年的股東總回報率爲-27%,好於上述股價回報率。而且,猜測股息支付在很大程度上解釋了這種分歧是沒有好處的!

A Different Perspective

不同的視角

Las Vegas Sands shareholders are down 25% for the year (even including dividends), but the market itself is up 27%. Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. Regrettably, last year's performance caps off a bad run, with the shareholders facing a total loss of 5% per year over five years. We realise that Baron Rothschild has said investors should "buy when there is blood on the streets", but we caution that investors should first be sure they are buying a high quality business. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Las Vegas Sands you should know about.

拉斯維加斯金沙集團的股東今年下跌了25%(甚至包括股息),但市場本身上漲了27%。即使是優質股票的股價有時也會下跌,但我們希望在過於感興趣之前看到企業基本指標的改善。遺憾的是,去年的業績結束了糟糕的表現,股東在五年內每年面臨5%的總虧損。我們意識到羅斯柴爾德男爵曾說過,投資者應該 “在街頭流血時買入”,但我們警告說,投資者應首先確保他們購買的是高質量的企業。儘管市場狀況可能對股價產生的不同影響值得考慮,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,考慮風險。每家公司都有它們,我們發現了3個你應該知道的拉斯維加斯金沙警告標誌。

If you are like me, then you will not want to miss this free list of growing companies that insiders are buying.

如果你像我一樣,那麼你不會想錯過這份業內人士正在收購的成長型公司的免費名單。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

請注意,本文引用的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所交易的股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論