share_log

MoneyLion Inc.'s (NYSE:ML) Market Cap Surged US$124m Last Week, Retail Investors Who Have a Lot Riding on the Company Were Rewarded

MoneyLion Inc.'s (NYSE:ML) Market Cap Surged US$124m Last Week, Retail Investors Who Have a Lot Riding on the Company Were Rewarded

MoneyLion Inc. 's(紐約證券交易所代碼:ML)上週市值飆升了1.24億美元,對公司有很大影響的散戶投資者獲得了回報
Simply Wall St ·  04/10 14:31

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over MoneyLion by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 13 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 散戶投資者對MoneyLion的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 前13名股東擁有公司50%的股份
  • 業內人士最近賣出了

To get a sense of who is truly in control of MoneyLion Inc. (NYSE:ML), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 37% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制了MoneyLion Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:ML),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到,散戶投資者擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲37%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, retail investors were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 18% gain.

結果,散戶投資者是上週18%漲幅的最大受益者。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of MoneyLion, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究MoneyLion的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:ML Ownership Breakdown April 10th 2024
紐約證券交易所:ML 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 10 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About MoneyLion?

關於MoneyLion,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

We can see that MoneyLion does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of MoneyLion, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,MoneyLion確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下MoneyLion過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:ML Earnings and Revenue Growth April 10th 2024
紐約證券交易所:ML 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 10 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in MoneyLion. Edison Partners L.P. is currently the largest shareholder, with 10% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.9% and 7.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Diwakar Choubey directly holds 5.9% of the total shares outstanding.

對沖基金在MoneyLion中的股票不多。愛迪生合夥人有限責任公司目前是最大股東,已發行股份的10%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的7.9%和7.4%。此外,該公司首席執行官迪瓦卡爾·喬貝直接持有已發行股份總額的5.9%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

在進一步挖掘之後,我們發現排名前13位的合計持有該公司的50%所有權,這表明沒有一個單一股東對公司擁有重要的控制權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of MoneyLion

MoneyLion 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of MoneyLion Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$904m, and insiders have US$195m worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

看來內部人士擁有MoneyLion Inc.的很大一部分股份。它的市值僅爲9.04億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值1.95億美元的股票。我們可以說這表明了與股東的一致性,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然很小;一些內部人士可能已經創立了該公司。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 37% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司37%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這個團體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With a stake of 24%, private equity firms could influence the MoneyLion board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股權公司持有24%的股份,可能會影響MoneyLion董事會。一些投資者可能會爲此感到鼓舞,因爲私募股權有時能夠鼓勵制定有助於市場看到公司價值的策略。或者,這些持有人可能會在投資上市後退出投資。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 3 warning signs we've spotted with MoneyLion .

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,你應該注意我們在MoneyLion上發現的3個警告信號。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論