share_log

Individual Investors in LanzaTech Global, Inc. (NASDAQ:LNZA) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 9.4% Last Week

Individual Investors in LanzaTech Global, Inc. (NASDAQ:LNZA) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 9.4% Last Week

LanzaTech Global, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:LNZA)的個人投資者是其最大的博彩玩家,上週股價上漲9.4%,他們的賭注得到了回報
Simply Wall St ·  04/10 06:15

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • LanzaTech Global's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 55% ownership
  • 18% of LanzaTech Global is held by insiders
  • LanzaTech Global擁有大量的個人投資者所有權,這表明關鍵決策受廣大公衆股東的影響
  • 共有5名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲55%
  • LanzaTech Global 18% 的股份由內部人士持有

A look at the shareholders of LanzaTech Global, Inc. (NASDAQ:LNZA) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 30% to be precise, is individual investors. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看LanzaTech Global, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:LNZA)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。持有公司股份最多的集團是個人投資者,準確地說約爲30%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

As a result, individual investors were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 9.4% gain.

因此,個人投資者是上週9.4%漲幅的最大受益者。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of LanzaTech Global.

在下圖中,我們放大了LanzaTech Global的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:LNZA Ownership Breakdown April 10th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:LNZA 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 10 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About LanzaTech Global?

關於LanzaTech Global,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

LanzaTech Global already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at LanzaTech Global's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

LanzaTech Global已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看LanzaTech Global的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:LNZA Earnings and Revenue Growth April 10th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:LNZA 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 10 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in LanzaTech Global. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Guardians of New Zealand Superannuation with 17% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 15% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 8.7% by the third-largest shareholder. Furthermore, CEO Jennifer Holmgren is the owner of 1.6% of the company's shares.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對LanzaTech Global進行有意義的投資。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大股東是新西蘭養老金衛士,已發行股份的17%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約15%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有8.7%的所有權。此外,首席執行官詹妮弗·霍爾姆格倫是該公司1.6%股份的所有者。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 55% of the company is controlled by the top 5 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我們的研究還揭示了這樣一個事實,即公司大約55%的股份由前五名股東控制,這表明這些所有者對業務具有重大影響。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of LanzaTech Global

LanzaTech Global 的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in LanzaTech Global, Inc.. Insiders have a US$111m stake in this US$621m business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有LanzaTech Global, Inc.的大量股份。業內人士在這筆6.21億美元的業務中持有1.11億美元的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有大量股份。你可以點擊這裏查看他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 30% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司30%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

Private equity firms hold a 24% stake in LanzaTech Global. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股權公司持有LanzaTech Global24%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。有時我們會看到私募股權長期存在,但總的來說,它們的投資期限較短,而且顧名思義,對上市公司的投資並不多。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售資本並將其重新部署到其他地方。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand LanzaTech Global better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that LanzaTech Global is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解LanzaTech Global,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意,LanzaTech Global在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警告信號,您應該知道...

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論