share_log

After the Recent Decline, Shenzhen Changhong Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300151) CEO Huanchang Li's Holdings Have Lost 4.7% of Their Value

After the Recent Decline, Shenzhen Changhong Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300151) CEO Huanchang Li's Holdings Have Lost 4.7% of Their Value

在最近的下跌之後,深圳長虹科技股份有限公司(深交所股票代碼:300151)首席執行官李煥昌的股價已經下跌了4.7%
Simply Wall St ·  03/23 20:50

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Shenzhen Changhong Technology's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • A total of 6 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • 13% of Shenzhen Changhong Technology is held by Institutions
  • 業內人士似乎對深圳長虹科技的增長有既得利益,從他們龐大的所有權來看
  • 共有6位投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲50%
  • 深圳長虹科技13%的股份由機構持有

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Shenzhen Changhong Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300151), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 45% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制了深圳長虹科技股份有限公司(SZSE: 300151),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。個人內部人士持有 45% 的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And following last week's 4.7% decline in share price, insiders suffered the most losses.

繼上週股價下跌4.7%之後,內部人士遭受的損失最大。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Shenzhen Changhong Technology, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究深圳長虹科技的每種所有者。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:300151 Ownership Breakdown March 24th 2024
SZSE: 300151 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 24 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shenzhen Changhong Technology?

關於深圳長虹科技,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Shenzhen Changhong Technology. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Shenzhen Changhong Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所見,機構投資者持有深圳長虹科技的大量股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們有時也會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看深圳長虹科技過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:300151 Earnings and Revenue Growth March 24th 2024
SZSE: 300151 2024年3月24日收益和收入增長

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Shenzhen Changhong Technology. The company's CEO Huanchang Li is the largest shareholder with 38% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 3.4% and 2.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Note that two of the top three shareholders are also Senior Key Executive and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively, once again pointing to significant ownership by company insiders.

對沖基金在深圳長虹科技的股份不多。該公司首席執行官李煥昌是最大股東,已發行股份的38%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的3.4%和2.8%。請注意,前三名股東中有兩位也是高級主要高管和董事會成員,這再次表明公司內部人士擁有大量股權。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 6 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

經過進一步檢查,我們發現公司一半以上的股份由前六名股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被較小的股東所平衡。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。儘管有一些分析師的報道,但該公司的報道可能並不廣泛。因此,在未來它可能會引起更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Shenzhen Changhong Technology

深圳長虹科技的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Shenzhen Changhong Technology Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥8.5b, and insiders have CN¥3.8b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有深圳長虹科技有限公司的大量股份。它的市值僅爲85億元人民幣,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值38億元人民幣的股票。這非常重要。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您不妨訪問這張顯示內部人士近期交易的免費圖表。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 40% stake in Shenzhen Changhong Technology. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有深圳長虹科技40%的股份。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Shenzhen Changhong Technology is showing 4 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those makes us a bit uncomfortable...

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。請注意,深圳長虹科技在我們的投資分析中顯示了4個警告信號,其中一個讓我們有點不舒服...

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論