share_log

Insiders Continue to Buy Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:GLSI) and Now Own 55% Shares

Insiders Continue to Buy Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:GLSI) and Now Own 55% Shares

業內人士繼續收購格林威治生命科學公司(納斯達克股票代碼:GLSI),現在擁有55%的股份
Simply Wall St ·  03/12 07:21

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Greenwich LifeSciences' growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • The top 4 shareholders own 52% of the company
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • 業內人士似乎對格林威治生命科學的增長有既得利益,從他們龐大的所有權可以看出
  • 前四名股東擁有公司52%的股份
  • 內部人士最近買了

Every investor in Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:GLSI) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 55% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

格林威治生命科學公司(納斯達克股票代碼:GLSI)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有55%所有權的個人內部人士。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Our data shows that insiders recently bought shares in the company and they were rewarded after market cap rose US$61m last week.

我們的數據顯示,內部人士最近購買了該公司的股票,並在上週市值上漲6100萬美元后獲得了回報。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Greenwich LifeSciences, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究格林威治生命科學的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:GLSI Ownership Breakdown March 12th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:GLSI 所有權明細 2024 年 3 月 12 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Greenwich LifeSciences?

關於格林威治生命科學,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

Since institutions own only a small portion of Greenwich LifeSciences, many may not have spent much time considering the stock. But it's clear that some have; and they liked it enough to buy in. So if the company itself can improve over time, we may well see more institutional buyers in the future. We sometimes see a rising share price when a few big institutions want to buy a certain stock at the same time. The history of earnings and revenue, which you can see below, could be helpful in considering if more institutional investors will want the stock. Of course, there are plenty of other factors to consider, too.

由於機構僅擁有格林威治生命科學的一小部分股份,因此許多機構可能沒有花太多時間考慮這隻股票。但很明顯,有些人有;他們很喜歡它,足以買進。因此,如果公司本身能夠隨着時間的推移而有所改善,那麼將來我們很可能會看到更多的機構買家。當一些大型機構想同時購買某隻股票時,我們有時會看到股價上漲。你可以在下面看到的收益和收入的歷史可能有助於考慮是否會有更多的機構投資者想要這隻股票。當然,還有很多其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:GLSI Earnings and Revenue Growth March 12th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:GLSI 收益和收入增長 2024 年 3 月 12 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Greenwich LifeSciences. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Snehal Patel with 42% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 4.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.1% by the third-largest shareholder. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Kenneth Hallock is also a Member of the Board of Directors, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對格林威治生命科學進行有意義的投資。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大股東是首席執行官斯內哈爾·帕特爾,其已發行股份爲42%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約4.8%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有3.1%的所有權。有趣的是,第三大股東肯尼思·哈洛克也是董事會成員,這再次表明公司最大股東擁有強大的內部所有權。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 4 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前四名股東控制着公司一半以上的股份,這意味着該集團對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。分析師對該股的報道很少,但報道不多。因此,它還有獲得更多報道的餘地。

Insider Ownership Of Greenwich LifeSciences

格林威治生命科學的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. So they have a US$124m stake in this US$227m business. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的最新數據表明,內部人士擁有格林威治生命科學公司的大部分股份。這意味着他們可以共同爲公司做出決定。因此,他們在這筆2.27億美元的業務中擁有1.24億美元的股份。大多數人會認爲這是積極的,顯示出與股東的強烈一致性。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 41% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Greenwich LifeSciences. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

擁有41%的所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對格林威治生命科學有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for Greenwich LifeSciences (of which 2 shouldn't be ignored!) you should know about.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。比如風險。每家公司都有它們,我們已經發現了格林威治生命科學的4個警告信號(其中2個不容忽視!)你應該知道。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論