share_log

Sigma Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ:SGML) Surges 7.7%; Private Equity Firms Who Own 44% Shares Profited Along With Institutions

Sigma Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ:SGML) Surges 7.7%; Private Equity Firms Who Own 44% Shares Profited Along With Institutions

西格瑪鋰業公司(納斯達克股票代碼:SGML)飆升7.7%;擁有44%股份的私募股權公司與機構一起獲利
Simply Wall St ·  02/29 10:26

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • The considerable ownership by private equity firms in Sigma Lithium indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • 53% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
  • Institutions own 34% of Sigma Lithium
  • 私募股權公司對Sigma Lithium的大量所有權表明,他們在管理和業務戰略中共同擁有更大的發言權
  • 53% 的業務由前三名股東持有
  • 機構擁有西格瑪鋰業34%的股份

If you want to know who really controls Sigma Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ:SGML), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that private equity firms own the lion's share in the company with 44% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着西格瑪鋰業公司(納斯達克股票代碼:SGML),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。我們可以看到,私募股權公司擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲44%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

Private equity firms gained the most after market cap touched US$1.5b last week, while institutions who own 34% also benefitted.

私募股權公司在上週市值觸及15億美元后漲幅最大,而持有34%的機構也從中受益。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Sigma Lithium, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Sigma Lithium的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:SGML Ownership Breakdown February 29th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:SGML 所有權明細 2024 年 2 月 29 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sigma Lithium?

關於西格瑪鋰業,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Sigma Lithium does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Sigma Lithium, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,Sigma Lithium確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下Sigma Lithium過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:SGML Earnings and Revenue Growth February 29th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:SGML 收益和收入增長 2024 年 2 月 29 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Sigma Lithium. The company's largest shareholder is A10 Investimentos Ltda., with ownership of 44%. With 4.9% and 4.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, Fitpart Fund Administration Services Limited and BlackRock, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對西格瑪鋰業進行有意義的投資。該公司的最大股東是A10 Investimentos Ltda.,所有權爲44%。Fitpart基金管理服務有限公司和貝萊德公司分別擁有4.9%和4.8%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前三名股東擁有公司的多數股權,這意味着他們足夠強大,足以影響公司的決策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Sigma Lithium

西格瑪鋰業的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Sigma Lithium Corporation. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$47m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

股東們可能會有興趣得知內部人士擁有西格瑪鋰業公司的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些可能有意義的調整通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約4700萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。儘管如此,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 16% stake in Sigma Lithium. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Sigma Lithium16%的股份。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

Private equity firms hold a 44% stake in Sigma Lithium. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股權公司持有西格瑪鋰業44%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。有時我們會看到私募股權長期存在,但總的來說,它們的投資期限較短,而且顧名思義,對上市公司的投資並不多。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售資本並將其重新部署到其他地方。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 3.2%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的3.2%。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過控股私營公司而對上市公司擁有權益,而不是以個人身份擁有權益。儘管很難得出任何寬泛的結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Sigma Lithium better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 5 warning signs for Sigma Lithium you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit unpleasant.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,要更好地了解西格瑪鋰電,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。一個很好的例子:我們發現了你應該注意的5個Sigma Lithium警告信號,其中一個有點不愉快。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論