share_log

John Wiley & Sons (NYSE:WLY) Three-year Losses Have Grown Faster Than Shareholder Returns Have Fallen, but the Stock Advances 3.2% This Past Week

John Wiley & Sons (NYSE:WLY) Three-year Losses Have Grown Faster Than Shareholder Returns Have Fallen, but the Stock Advances 3.2% This Past Week

John Wiley & Sons(紐約證券交易所代碼:WLY)三年期虧損的增長速度快於股東回報率的下降速度,但該股上週上漲了3.2%
Simply Wall St ·  02/13 07:43

In order to justify the effort of selecting individual stocks, it's worth striving to beat the returns from a market index fund. But if you try your hand at stock picking, your risk returning less than the market. We regret to report that long term John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (NYSE:WLY) shareholders have had that experience, with the share price dropping 35% in three years, versus a market return of about 16%. And more recent buyers are having a tough time too, with a drop of 25% in the last year.

爲了證明選擇個股的努力是合理的,值得努力超過市場指數基金的回報。但是,如果你嘗試選股,你的風險回報低於市場。我們遺憾地報告,John Wiley & Sons, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:WLY)的長期股東有過這樣的經歷,股價在三年內下跌了35%,而市場回報率約爲16%。最近的買家也遇到了艱難時期,去年下降了25%。

While the last three years has been tough for John Wiley & Sons shareholders, this past week has shown signs of promise. So let's look at the longer term fundamentals and see if they've been the driver of the negative returns.

儘管過去三年對John Wiley & Sons的股東來說是艱難的,但過去一週顯示出希望的跡象。因此,讓我們來看看長期基本面,看看它們是否是負回報的驅動力。

In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.

在他的文章中 格雷厄姆和多茲維爾的超級投資者 禾倫·巴菲特描述了股價如何並不總是合理地反映企業的價值。評估公司情緒變化的一種有缺陷但合理的方法是將每股收益(EPS)與股價進行比較。

During five years of share price growth, John Wiley & Sons moved from a loss to profitability. On the other hand, it reported a trailing twelve months loss, suggesting it isn't reliably profitable. Other metrics may better explain the share price move.

在五年的股價增長中,John Wiley & Sons從虧損轉爲盈利。另一方面,它報告了過去十二個月的虧損,這表明它無法可靠地盈利。其他指標可以更好地解釋股價走勢。

We note that the dividend seems healthy enough, so that probably doesn't explain the share price drop. John Wiley & Sons has maintained its top line over three years, so we doubt that has shareholders worried. A closer look at revenue and profit trends might yield insights.

我們注意到,股息似乎足夠健康,因此這可能無法解釋股價下跌的原因。John Wiley & Sons在三年內一直保持收入水平,因此我們懷疑這會讓股東感到擔憂。仔細研究收入和利潤趨勢可能會得出見解。

The company's revenue and earnings (over time) are depicted in the image below (click to see the exact numbers).

公司的收入和收益(隨着時間的推移)如下圖所示(點擊查看確切數字)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:WLY Earnings and Revenue Growth February 13th 2024
紐約證券交易所:WLY 收益和收入增長 2024 年 2 月 13 日

We like that insiders have been buying shares in the last twelve months. Even so, future earnings will be far more important to whether current shareholders make money. So it makes a lot of sense to check out what analysts think John Wiley & Sons will earn in the future (free profit forecasts).

像我們一樣,內部人士在過去的十二個月中一直在購買股票。即便如此,未來的收益對於當前股東是否賺錢將更爲重要。因此,看看分析師認爲John Wiley & Sons未來的收入(自由利潤預測)是很有意義的。

What About Dividends?

分紅呢?

It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. We note that for John Wiley & Sons the TSR over the last 3 years was -28%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. This is largely a result of its dividend payments!

重要的是要考慮任何給定股票的股東總回報率和股價回報率。股東總回報率是一種回報計算方法,它考慮了現金分紅的價值(假設收到的任何股息都經過再投資)以及任何貼現資本籌集和分拆的計算價值。可以公平地說,股東總回報率爲支付股息的股票提供了更完整的畫面。我們注意到,對於John Wiley & Sons來說,過去3年的股東總回報率爲-28%,好於上述股價回報率。這在很大程度上是其股息支付的結果!

A Different Perspective

不同的視角

John Wiley & Sons shareholders are down 22% for the year (even including dividends), but the market itself is up 21%. Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. Regrettably, last year's performance caps off a bad run, with the shareholders facing a total loss of 4% per year over five years. We realise that Baron Rothschild has said investors should "buy when there is blood on the streets", but we caution that investors should first be sure they are buying a high quality business. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with John Wiley & Sons .

約翰·威利父子公司的股東今年下跌了22%(甚至包括股息),但市場本身上漲了21%。即使是優質股票的股價有時也會下跌,但我們希望在過於感興趣之前看到企業基本指標的改善。遺憾的是,去年的業績結束了糟糕的表現,股東在五年內每年面臨4%的總虧損。我們意識到羅斯柴爾德男爵曾說過,投資者應該 “在街頭流血時買入”,但我們警告說,投資者應首先確保他們購買的是高質量的企業。儘管市場狀況可能對股價產生的不同影響值得考慮,但還有其他因素更爲重要。爲此,你應該注意我們在 John Wiley & Sons 身上發現的兩個警告信號。

John Wiley & Sons is not the only stock that insiders are buying. For those who like to find winning investments this free list of growing companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket.

約翰·威利父子並不是內部人士唯一買入的股票。對於那些喜歡尋找獲利投資的人來說,這份最近有內幕收購的成長型公司的免費清單可能就是入場券。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

請注意,本文引用的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所交易的股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論