share_log

TOM Group Limited's (HKG:2383) Market Cap Dropped HK$435m Last Week; Public Companies Bore the Brunt

TOM Group Limited's (HKG:2383) Market Cap Dropped HK$435m Last Week; Public Companies Bore the Brunt

TOM Group Limited(HKG: 2383)的市值上週下降了4.35億港元;上市公司首當其衝
Simply Wall St ·  2023/08/09 18:56

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over TOM Group by public companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 2 shareholders own 61% of the company
  • Insider ownership in TOM Group is 34%
  • 上市公司對TOM集團的顯著控制意味著公眾有更多的權力影響與管理和治理相關的決策
  • 最大的兩個股東擁有公司61%的股份
  • TOM集團的內部人持股比例為34%

Every investor in TOM Group Limited (HKG:2383) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are public companies with 36% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

TOM集團有限公司(HKG:2383)的每一位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。而在這塊蛋糕上分得最大一塊蛋糕的是擁有36%股權的上市公司。換句話說,該集團面臨著最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

While the holdings of public companies took a hit after last week's 13% price drop, insiders with their 34% also suffered.

雖然上市公司的持股在上週股價下跌13%後受到了打擊,但持有34%股份的內部人士也受到了打擊。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about TOM Group.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能為我們提供什麼關於Tom Group的資訊。

Check out our latest analysis for TOM Group

查看我們對TOM集團的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:2383 Ownership Breakdown August 9th 2023
聯交所:2383所有權分類2023年8月9日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About TOM Group?

關於TOM集團,機構所有權的缺失告訴了我們什麼?

Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.

交易不太活躍的小公司往往缺乏機構投資者,但大公司沒有機構投資者的情況較少。

There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. TOM Group might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.

對於機構為何不持有股票,有多種解釋。最常見的是,相對於管理下的資金,該公司規模太小,因此該機構不會費心密切關注該公司。基金經理也有可能不持有這只股票,因為他們不相信它會表現良好。Tom Group可能沒有機構正在尋找的那種過去的業績,或者他們只是沒有仔細研究過這項業務。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:2383 Earnings and Revenue Growth August 9th 2023
聯交所:2023年8月9日盈利及收入增長2383

TOM Group is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is CK Hutchison Holdings Limited with 36% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 25% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 8.4% by the third-largest shareholder. Hoi Shuen Chau, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Top Key Executive.

TOM集團並非由對沖基金所有。看我們的數據,我們可以看到,第一大股東是長和控股有限公司,持有36%的流通股。作為參考,第二大股東持有約25%的流通股,第三大股東持有8.4%的股份。作為第二大股東的海順洲,也恰好持有最關鍵高管的頭銜。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

為了讓我們的研究更有趣,我們發現,前兩名股東擁有公司的多數股權,這意味著他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

研究機構持股是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。目前,我們沒有注意到分析師對該股的報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of TOM Group

TOM集團的內部人所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管對內部人的準確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認為董事會成員是內部人.管理層最終要向董事會負責.然而,經理人擔任執行董事會成員並不少見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官的話.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認為內部人持股是積極的,因為它可以表明董事會與其他股東很好地結盟.然而,在某些情況下,太多的權力集中在這個群體中.

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in TOM Group Limited. Insiders have a HK$980m stake in this HK$2.9b business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的資訊顯示,內部人士持有TOM集團有限公司的大量股份。在這筆29億港元的交易中,內部人士持有9.8億港元的股份。看到內部人士如此投資於這項業務,真是太好了。或許值得一查的是,這些內部人士最近是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 25% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over TOM Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有25%股權的普通公眾,主要由個人投資者組成,對TOM集團有一定程度的影響力。這種規模的所有權雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私營公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 4.7%, of the TOM Group stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

看起來私營公司持有TOM集團4.7%的股份。僅從這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得調查一下誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過一家獨立的私人公司擁有上市公司的股份。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

It appears to us that public companies own 36% of TOM Group. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

在我們看來,上市公司擁有TOM集團36%的股份。這可能是一種戰略利益,兩家公司可能有相關的商業利益。這可能是因為它們已經解體。這一持股可能值得進一步調查。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - TOM Group has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同集團是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。以風險為例-TOM集團擁有1個個警告標誌我們認為你應該意識到.

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

當然了這可能不是最值得購買的股票。。所以讓我們來看看這個免費 免費有趣的公司名單。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數位是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最後一個月的12個月期間.這可能與全年的年度報告數位不一致.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫.或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是暗示Wallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性.我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議.它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況.我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析.請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內.Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉.

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論