share_log

TOM Group Limited's (HKG:2383) Market Cap Dropped HK$435m Last Week; Public Companies Bore the Brunt

TOM Group Limited's (HKG:2383) Market Cap Dropped HK$435m Last Week; Public Companies Bore the Brunt

TOM Group Limited(HKG: 2383)的市值上周下降了4.35亿港元;上市公司首当其冲
Simply Wall St ·  2023/08/09 18:56

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significant control over TOM Group by public companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 2 shareholders own 61% of the company
  • Insider ownership in TOM Group is 34%
  • 上市公司对TOM集团的显著控制意味着公众有更多的权力影响与管理和治理相关的决策
  • 最大的两个股东拥有公司61%的股份
  • TOM集团的内部人持股比例为34%

Every investor in TOM Group Limited (HKG:2383) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are public companies with 36% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

TOM集团有限公司(HKG:2383)的每一位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。而在这块蛋糕上分得最大一块蛋糕的是拥有36%股权的上市公司。换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

While the holdings of public companies took a hit after last week's 13% price drop, insiders with their 34% also suffered.

虽然上市公司的持股在上周股价下跌13%后受到了打击,但持有34%股份的内部人士也受到了打击。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about TOM Group.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能为我们提供什么关于Tom Group的信息。

Check out our latest analysis for TOM Group

查看我们对TOM集团的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:2383 Ownership Breakdown August 9th 2023
联交所:2383所有权分类2023年8月9日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About TOM Group?

关于TOM集团,机构所有权的缺失告诉了我们什么?

Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.

交易不太活跃的小公司往往缺乏机构投资者,但大公司没有机构投资者的情况较少。

There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. TOM Group might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.

对于机构为何不持有股票,有多种解释。最常见的是,相对于管理下的资金,该公司规模太小,因此该机构不会费心密切关注该公司。基金经理也有可能不持有这只股票,因为他们不相信它会表现良好。Tom Group可能没有机构正在寻找的那种过去的业绩,或者他们只是没有仔细研究过这项业务。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:2383 Earnings and Revenue Growth August 9th 2023
联交所:2023年8月9日盈利及收入增长2383

TOM Group is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is CK Hutchison Holdings Limited with 36% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 25% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 8.4% by the third-largest shareholder. Hoi Shuen Chau, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Top Key Executive.

TOM集团并非由对冲基金所有。看我们的数据,我们可以看到,第一大股东是长和控股有限公司,持有36%的流通股。作为参考,第二大股东持有约25%的流通股,第三大股东持有8.4%的股份。作为第二大股东的海顺洲,也恰好持有最关键高管的头衔。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

为了让我们的研究更有趣,我们发现,前两名股东拥有公司的多数股权,这意味着他们足够强大,可以影响公司的决策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

研究机构持股是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以达到同样的效果。目前,我们没有注意到分析师对该股的报道,因此该公司不太可能被广泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of TOM Group

TOM集团的内部人所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管对内部人的准确定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人。管理层最终要向董事会负责。然而,经理人担任执行董事会成员并不少见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官的话。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部人持股是积极的,因为它可以表明董事会与其他股东很好地结盟。然而,在某些情况下,太多的权力集中在这个群体中。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in TOM Group Limited. Insiders have a HK$980m stake in this HK$2.9b business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们的信息显示,内部人士持有TOM集团有限公司的大量股份。在这笔29亿港元的交易中,内部人士持有9.8亿港元的股份。看到内部人士如此投资于这项业务,真是太好了。或许值得一查的是,这些内部人士最近是否一直在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 25% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over TOM Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

拥有25%股权的普通公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对TOM集团有一定程度的影响力。这种规模的所有权虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私营公司所有权

It seems that Private Companies own 4.7%, of the TOM Group stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

看起来私营公司持有TOM集团4.7%的股份。仅从这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得调查一下谁拥有这些私营公司。有时,内部人士或其他关联方通过一家独立的私人公司拥有上市公司的股份。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有权

It appears to us that public companies own 36% of TOM Group. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

在我们看来,上市公司拥有TOM集团36%的股份。这可能是一种战略利益,两家公司可能有相关的商业利益。这可能是因为它们已经解体。这一持股可能值得进一步调查。

Next Steps:

接下来的步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - TOM Group has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同集团是很值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。以风险为例-TOM集团拥有1个警告标志我们认为你应该意识到。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

当然了这可能不是最值得购买的股票。。所以让我们来看看这个免费 免费有趣的公司名单。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发