share_log

Recent 4.8% Pullback Would Hurt Chengdu Leejun Industrial Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002651) Insiders

Recent 4.8% Pullback Would Hurt Chengdu Leejun Industrial Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002651) Insiders

近期 4.8% 的回調將損害成都利君實業股份有限公司(SZSE: 002651)內部人士
Simply Wall St ·  2023/04/14 19:37

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Chengdu Leejun Industrial's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • The top 2 shareholders own 60% of the company
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 業內人士似乎對成都利君實業的增長有既得利益,他們的龐大所有權就證明了這一點
  • 前兩名股東擁有公司60%的股份
  • 公司過去的表現以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有一個很好的瞭解

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Chengdu Leejun Industrial Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002651), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 71% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解誰真正控制成都利君實業股份有限公司(SZSE: 002651),瞭解企業的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到,個人內部人士擁有公司的大部分股份,所有權爲71%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現下跌,則損失最大)。

As market cap fell to CN¥7.6b last week, insiders would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.

隨着上週市值跌至76億元人民幣,內部人士面臨的損失將超過該公司任何其他股東羣體。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Chengdu Leejun Industrial.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於成都利君實業的哪些信息。

See our latest analysis for Chengdu Leejun Industrial

查看我們對成都利君實業的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:002651 Ownership Breakdown April 14th 2023
深交所:002651 所有權明細 2023 年 4 月 14 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Chengdu Leejun Industrial?

關於成都利君實業,機構所有權告訴我們甚麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

Chengdu Leejun Industrial already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Chengdu Leejun Industrial's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

成都利君實業已經有機構在股權登記處。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所帶來的假定驗證。他們也是,有時候會錯的。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,下面值得一看成都利君實業的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:002651 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 14th 2023
深交所:002651 2023 年 4 月 14 日收益和收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Chengdu Leejun Industrial. Yamin He is currently the largest shareholder, with 32% of shares outstanding. With 28% and 11% of the shares outstanding respectively, Jia He and Yong Wei are the second and third largest shareholders.

我們注意到,對沖基金對成都利君實業的投資不大。何亞敏目前是最大的股東,已發行股份的32%。嘉和永偉分別佔28%和11%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 60% stake.

對股東登記處的更詳細研究表明,其中兩位最大股東通過其60%的股份擁有公司的大量所有權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以瞭解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。我們目前沒有收到分析師對該股的任何報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Chengdu Leejun Industrial

成都利君實業的內幕所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該羣體中。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Chengdu Leejun Industrial Co., Ltd. stock. This gives them a lot of power. That means insiders have a very meaningful CN¥5.4b stake in this CN¥7.6b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been selling any of their shares.

看來內部人士擁有成都利君實業股份有限公司一半以上的股票。這給了他們很大的力量。這意味着內部人士在這家76億元的業務中擁有非常有意義的54億元人民幣股份。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士是否在出售他們的任何股票。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司20%的股份,因此不容易被忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決定與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司的政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Chengdu Leejun Industrial , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我覺得看看究竟是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們也需要考慮其他信息。例如,以永遠存在的投資風險幽靈爲例。 我們已經發現了 1 個警告標誌 與成都利君實業合作,瞭解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

當然 這可能不是最值得買的股票。因此,您不妨看看我們的 免費的 一系列具有良好財務狀況的有趣潛在客戶。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂? 取得聯繫 直接和我們聯繫。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是一般性的。 我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。 它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未將最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。簡而言之,華爾街對上述任何股票都沒有頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論