share_log

Covid-19 Vaccine Efficacy: What Do the Numbers -2-

Covid-19 Vaccine Efficacy: What Do the Numbers -2-

新冠肺炎疫苗效力:數字是什麼-2-
Dow Jones Newswires ·  2021/08/26 13:32

DJ Covid-19 Vaccine Efficacy: What Do the Numbers Really Mean?

DJ新冠肺炎疫苗效力:這些數字到底意味着什麼?


By Jared S. Hopkins and Sarah Toy

作者:賈裏德·S·霍普金斯和莎拉·託伊

The spread of the Delta variant, an increase in vaccinated people testing positive for Covid-19, and the U.S. government's call for booster shots have raised new questions about the power of the coronavirus vaccines. Here's what we know about how authorized vaccines perform against the variant, and their ability to prevent infection and serious illness.

三角洲變異病毒的傳播,新冠肺炎檢測呈陽性的疫苗接種人數的增加,以及美國政府呼籲加強注射,都讓人們對冠狀病毒疫苗的效力提出了新的質疑。以下是我們所知道的授權疫苗如何對抗變種,以及它們預防感染和嚴重疾病的能力。

What does it mean to say that a vaccine is effective?

説疫苗有效是什麼意思?

Health experts and scientists use a variety of terms and measures to describe how well a vaccine works. Vaccines can be evaluated based on their ability to prevent initial infection, symptomatic disease or severe illness that can lead to hospitalization or death.

衞生專家和科學家使用各種術語和措施來描述疫苗的效果。疫苗可以根據其預防初始感染、症狀性疾病或可能導致住院或死亡的嚴重疾病的能力進行評估。

When researchers use the term efficacy, they are describing how a vaccine performs under ideal, tightly controlled conditions such as clinical trials. Effectiveness refers to how the vaccine performs in the real world, when people are living their normal lives without the same controls in place.

當研究人員使用有效性一詞時,他們描述的是疫苗在理想的、嚴格控制的條件下(如臨牀試驗)的表現。有效性指的是疫苗在現實世界中的表現,當人們在沒有同樣的控制措施的情況下過着正常的生活。

The vaccines authorized in the U.S. were shown in clinical trials to protect against symptomatic Covid-19. Researchers looked at whether the vaccines prevented people from both testing positive for Covid-19 and showing at least one symptom. The studies didn't measure if the vaccines protect against asymptomatic infection, which means simply testing positive for Covid-19.

美國授權的疫苗在臨牀試驗中顯示,可以預防有症狀的新冠肺炎。研究人員觀察了疫苗是否能阻止人們在新冠肺炎檢測中呈陽性,並至少出現一種症狀。這些研究沒有衡量疫苗是否能預防無症狀感染,這意味着只需對新冠肺炎檢測呈陽性。

For instance, in large late-stage clinical trials conducted by vaccine makers, the vaccine from Pfizer Inc. and partner BioNTech SE was found last year to be 95% effective at preventing symptomatic Covid-19, while the Moderna Inc. vaccine was 94.1% effective. In the approximately 44,000-person study of the Pfizer vaccine, 170 developed Covid-19 with at least one symptom. Of those, just eight had been vaccinated, while 162 had received a placebo. The 95% efficacy rate is derived from that ratio.

例如,在疫苗製造商進行的大型後期臨牀試驗中,輝瑞公司及其合作伙伴BioNtech SE的疫苗去年被發現在預防有症狀的新冠肺炎方面有效率為95%,而現代公司的疫苗有效率為94.1%。在對輝瑞疫苗的大約44,000人的研究中,170人患上了至少有一種症狀的新冠肺炎。在這些人中,只有8人接種了疫苗,162人接受了安慰劑。95%的有效率就是從這個比率得出的。

The Food and Drug Administration's full approval of the Pfizer vaccine in August was based on six months of clinical-trial data that showed efficacy was 91.1%, a rate drawn from 77 vaccinated people who became sick, compared with 833 sick subjects who received a placebo. The lower efficacy rate was because the companies had more time to collect data than for the efficacy rate calculated from the late-stage trial last year, according to Pfizer.

美國食品和藥物管理局(Food and Drug Administration,簡稱FDA)8月份全面批准輝瑞(Pfizer)疫苗是基於六個月的臨牀試驗數據,這些數據顯示,有效性為91.1%,這一比率來自77名接種疫苗的患者,而接受安慰劑的患者為833人。根據輝瑞公司的説法,有效率較低是因為與去年後期試驗計算的有效率相比,這些公司有更多的時間收集數據。

Severe Covid-19 is defined by the FDA as including outcomes such as pneumonia, respiratory failure, organ failure and death.

食品和藥物管理局將嚴重新冠肺炎定義為包括肺炎、呼吸衰竭、器官衰竭和死亡等後果。

Do Covid-19 vaccines prevent infection? Has Delta changed that?

新冠肺炎疫苗能預防感染嗎?達美航空改變了這一點嗎?

The vaccines' manufacturers didn't study prevention of infection in their clinical trials -- they evaluated symptomatic Covid-19 -- but say they are exploring the issue.

疫苗製造商在他們的臨牀試驗中沒有研究預防感染--他們評估了有症狀的新冠肺炎--但説他們正在探索這個問題。

Several studies conducted by other researchers before Delta began to spread widely showed that Covid-19 vaccines were highly effective at preventing infection. A study published in July in the Annals of Internal Medicine that analyzed Covid-19 testing records of more than 54,000 U.S. veterans between December and March showed the Pfizer vaccine was 96% effective at preventing infection and the Moderna vaccine 98% effective. An April study published in the Lancet of about 23,000 healthcare workers in the U.K., most of whom had received the Pfizer shot, concluded it was 85% effective against infection. Real-world evidence in Israel also demonstrated that the Pfizer vaccine was highly effective at preventing infection.

在達美航空開始廣泛傳播之前,其他研究人員進行的幾項研究表明,新冠肺炎疫苗在預防感染方面非常有效。7月份發表在“內科醫學年鑑”上的一項研究分析了去年12月至3月期間54,000多名美國退伍軍人的新冠肺炎測試記錄,結果顯示輝瑞疫苗預防感染的有效率為96%,現代疫苗的有效率為98%。4月份發表在《柳葉刀》(Lancet)上的一項研究對英國約2.3萬名醫護人員進行了調查,其中大多數人都接受了輝瑞(Pfizer)的注射。研究得出結論,該藥對感染的有效率為85%。以色列的真實證據也表明,輝瑞疫苗在預防感染方面非常有效。

Some researchers, however, have found a drop in effectiveness against infection with the Delta variant.

然而,一些研究人員發現,對抗Delta變種感染的有效性有所下降。

A study by the Mayo Clinic Health System, posted in August on a preprint server that publishes papers before peer review, found that the Pfizer vaccine was 42% effective against infection in July, when the Delta variant became dominant in the U.S., compared with 76% before that month. The effectiveness of Moderna's shot fell to 76% from 86%. Another preprint by a research group in Qatar found that two doses of the Pfizer vaccine were 53.5% effective at stopping infection from Delta, while Moderna was 85% effective.

梅奧診所健康系統(Mayo Clinic Health System)8月份在一家預印服務器上發佈的一項研究發現,輝瑞疫苗在7月份預防感染的有效性為42%,當時Delta變體在美國占主導地位,而在那之前,這一比例為76%。該研究於8月份發佈在一家預印服務器上,該服務器在同行評審之前發佈了論文。莫德納的射門命中率從86%降至76%。卡塔爾一個研究小組的另一份預印本發現,兩劑輝瑞疫苗在阻止達美航空感染方面的有效率為53.5%,而現代疫苗的有效率為85%。

A study by New York state government researchers found that the effectiveness of the Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson vaccines collectively to prevent infections dropped to about 80% in late July, when the Delta variant was spreading, from about 91% in early May.

紐約州政府研究人員的一項研究發現,輝瑞、摩德納和強生疫苗對預防感染的整體有效性從5月初的約91%降至7月下旬的約80%,當時Delta變種正在蔓延。

In a U.S. government study of weekly case counts at about 3,800 nursing homes released in August, researchers found effectiveness of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines against infection decreased over time from 75% in March to 53% on Aug. 1. A study published in the Lancet in June also showed declining effectiveness against infection in people in Scotland who received either Pfizer or AstraZeneca PLC vaccines. The AstraZeneca vaccine isn't authorized for use in the U.S.

在美國政府8月份公佈的一項針對大約3,800家療養院每週病例統計的研究中,研究人員發現,隨着時間的推移,輝瑞(Pfizer)和現代那(Modina)疫苗對感染的有效性從3月份的75%下降到8月1日的53%。6月份發表在“柳葉刀”(The Lancet)上的一項研究還顯示,蘇格蘭接種輝瑞(Pfizer)或阿斯利康疫苗的人對感染的有效性正在下降。阿斯利康(AstraZeneca)疫苗未獲授權在美國使用。

John Moore, an immunologist at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York, said studies don't find the same rates of prevention because researchers are evaluating under slightly varying conditions such as time periods or geographies. "It's hard to know where the percentage of efficacy drop is because they vary in studies, and have different circumstances, and putting a single number on them is tricky," he said.

紐約威爾·康奈爾醫學院(Weill Cornell Medical College)的免疫學家約翰·摩爾(John Moore)説,研究沒有發現相同的預防率,因為研究人員是在時間段或地理位置等略有不同的條件下進行評估的。他説:“很難知道療效下降的百分比在哪裏,因為它們在不同的研究中有不同的情況,而且給出一個單一的數字是很棘手的。”

Jennifer Nuzzo, an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins University, said infections in fully vaccinated people aren't surprising because the vaccines aren't entirely protective and vaccinated people have interacted with other people more frequently, making exposure to the virus more likely. "What we're seeing is more infections among vaccinated people," she said. "We always expected that."

約翰·霍普金斯大學流行病學家詹妮弗·努佐表示,完全接種疫苗的人感染病毒並不令人意外,因為疫苗並不完全具有保護作用,而且接種疫苗的人與其他人的互動更頻繁,這使得接觸病毒的可能性更大。她説:“我們看到的是,在接種疫苗的人羣中有更多的人受到感染。”“我們一直都預料到這一點。”

The growing number of breakthrough cases reflects the greater contagiousness of the Delta variant combined with the likelihood that immunity from vaccines is declining over time, Dr. Moore said.

摩爾博士説,突破性病例數量的增加反映了Delta變種的傳染性更強,以及疫苗免疫力隨着時間推移而下降的可能性。

Symptoms in most of the breakthrough cases, though, tend to be mild, he said. "There's this perception that the vaccines are failing when they're really not," he said.

不過,他説,大多數突破性病例的症狀往往都很輕微。他説:“有一種看法認為,疫苗正在失敗,而實際上並非如此。”

Do vaccines still prevent symptomatic illness in people infected with the Delta variant?

疫苗仍然可以預防感染Delta變種的人的症狀性疾病嗎?

Studies have shown some declines in vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic illness from Delta.

研究表明,三角洲地區針對症狀性疾病的疫苗效力有所下降。

A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine in July showed that the effectiveness of two doses of the Pfizer vaccine against symptomatic illness was lower among people in the U.K. with the Delta variant (88%) compared with those with the Alpha variant (93.7%), the strain previously dominant in the country.

7月發表在《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》(The New England Journal Of Medicine)上的一項研究顯示,在英國,兩劑輝瑞(Pfizer)疫苗對症狀性疾病的有效性(88%)低於阿爾法(Alpha)變異(93.7%),阿爾法變異之前在英國占主導地位。

More recent studies also show drops in effectiveness against symptomatic illness, including a preprint study from August by researchers at the University of Oxford that found that the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines' effectiveness for both infections and symptomatic illness fell over time.

最近的研究也顯示,對抗症狀性疾病的有效性有所下降,包括牛津大學(University Of Oxford)研究人員從8月份開始的一項預印本研究,該研究發現,輝瑞(Pfizer)和阿斯利康(AstraZeneca)疫苗對感染和症狀性疾病的有效性都隨着時間的推移而下降。

More symptomatic infections and declining vaccine effectiveness are likely a reflection of the vaccine's strength dropping as well as the high rate of spread of the Delta variant, said Saad Omer, a virologist and director of the Yale Institute for Global Health. "It's hard to disentangle the effects of the Delta variant itself and the waning immunity. I think it's both," he said.

耶魯大學全球衞生研究所(Yale Institute For Global Health)主任、病毒學家薩阿德·奧梅爾(Saad Omer)表示,更多的症狀性感染和疫苗效力的下降可能反映了疫苗效力的下降,以及三角洲變體的高傳播率。他説:“很難理清德爾塔變種本身和免疫力減弱的影響。我認為兩者都有。”

Federal regulators will likely approve a Covid-19 booster shot for vaccinated adults starting at least six months after the previous dose amid data on waning immunity, The Wall Street Journal reported. Still, some public-health experts have said boosters aren't necessary based on studies that show continuing protection against hospitalizations and death from the initial round of shots. Pfizer and BioNTech asked regulators to authorize boosters of their Covid-19 vaccine and submitted additional data showing a third dose improves protection against the virus.

據《華爾街日報》報道,由於免疫力減弱的數據顯示,聯邦監管機構可能會批准為成年人接種新冠肺炎,從上一針接種後至少六個月開始。儘管如此,一些公共衞生專家説,根據研究表明,在最初一輪注射中繼續預防住院和死亡是沒有必要的。輝瑞公司和生物科技公司要求監管機構授權他們的新冠肺炎疫苗的增強劑,並提交了更多的數據,表明第三劑疫苗可以增強對病毒的保護。

Do Covid-19 vaccines still prevent severe disease and hospitalization?

新冠肺炎疫苗還能預防嚴重疾病和住院嗎?

Despite mounting evidence of reduced effectiveness at preventing infection, studies show the vaccines continue to prevent severe illness and death.

儘管越來越多的證據表明,疫苗在預防感染方面的有效性降低,但研究表明,疫苗繼續預防嚴重疾病和死亡。

A recent federal government study of more than 1,100 patients who received either the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine found effectiveness against hospitalization stayed steady over 24 weeks from early March to mid-July.

聯邦政府最近對接受輝瑞或現代疫苗的1100多名患者進行的一項研究發現,從3月初到7月中旬的24周內,對抗住院的有效性保持穩定。

A study by New York state government researchers found that collectively the Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson vaccine effectiveness rate of more than 95% at preventing hospitalizations held up from early May to late July, when the Delta variant was spreading.

紐約州政府研究人員的一項研究發現,從5月初到7月下旬,在預防住院方面,輝瑞、現代和強生疫苗的總有效率超過了95%,當時Delta變種正在蔓延。

What should I know about what happened in Provincetown, Mass.?

關於馬薩諸塞州普羅文斯敦發生的事情,我應該知道些什麼?

When the the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently said vaccinated people should wear masks again indoors in areas where Delta is spreading rapidly, it pointed to data from Provincetown, Mass., where it said large gatherings in July at bars, nightclubs and house parties led to at least 430 Covid-19 infections.

美國疾病控制和預防中心(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,簡稱CDC)最近表示,在達美航空傳播迅速的地區,接種疫苗的人應該再次在室內佩戴口罩。它引用了來自馬薩諸塞州普羅文斯敦的數據,稱7月份在那裏的酒吧、夜總會和家庭派對上的大型集會導致至少430人感染新冠肺炎。

The CDC said that nearly three-quarters of infected people were fully vaccinated and that samples showed the amount of virus infected people carried was similar between vaccinated and unvaccinated people.

疾控中心表示,近四分之三的感染者已經完全接種了疫苗,樣本顯示,接種疫苗的人和未接種疫苗的人攜帶的病毒數量相似。

Some scientists say Provincetown data isn't enough to be the primary driver of a public-health policy change. Provincetown has a high vaccination rate, and missing from the data is the total number of people who were at risk of being infected, which public health experts say is needed to actually assess vaccine effectiveness. Provincetown's population grows to 60,000 from 3,000 during the summer, according to the government.

一些科學家説,普羅文斯敦的數據不足以成為公共衞生政策變化的主要驅動力。普羅文斯敦的疫苗接種率很高,數據中缺少的是面臨感染風險的總人數,公共衞生專家表示,這是實際評估疫苗有效性所必需的。根據政府的數據,普羅文斯敦的人口從夏季的3000人增加到6萬人。

Some experts also say the data was too small of a sample and the circumstances too unique -- as there were unusually large gatherings at bars, nightclubs and house parties -- for it to be applied to other parts of the country.

一些專家還説,這些數據的樣本太小,而且情況太獨特--因為酒吧、夜總會和家庭聚會都有異常大型的聚會--不適合將其應用於美國其他地區。

Does data from Israel indicate vaccines don't protect well?

以色列的數據是否表明疫苗沒有很好的保護作用?

(MORE TO FOLLOW) Dow Jones Newswires

(更多後續報道)道瓊斯通訊社

August 26, 2021 13:32 ET (17:32 GMT)

2021年8月26日美國東部時間13:32(格林尼治標準時間17:32)

DJ Covid-19 Vaccine Efficacy: What Do the Numbers -2-

DJ新冠肺炎疫苗效力:數字是什麼-2-

Data from Israel's government showed the Pfizer vaccine was 39% effective at reducing the risk of infection and 40% effective at reducing the risk of symptomatic disease between June 20 and July 27 , a period of when Delta was the dominant strain there. The vaccine was 91% effective at preventing severe illness in the same period. Researchers haven't published a full manuscript, given a sample size for the effectiveness or provided many details on the vaccinated subjects.

來自以色列政府的數據顯示,在6月20日至7月27日期間,輝瑞疫苗在降低感染風險方面有效39%,在降低症狀性疾病風險方面有效40%,在這段時間裏,Delta是以色列的主導菌株。在同一時期,疫苗在預防嚴重疾病方面的有效率為91%。研究人員還沒有發表完整的手稿,給出了有效性的樣本大小,也沒有提供關於疫苗接種對象的許多細節。

The same study showed that breakthrough cases in Israel counted between July 11 and July 17 were more likely for people whose second shots were administered in January and February. These individuals were among the earliest people to become vaccinated, and therefore the furthest out from the second shot.

同一項研究顯示,以色列在7月11日至7月17日期間統計的突破性病例更有可能發生在1月和2月進行第二次注射的人。這些人是最早接種疫苗的人之一,因此離第二針最遠。

Other researchers say the Israeli data was too limited to draw firm conclusions and are waiting for a peer-reviewed manuscript. They say that while the government researchers considered people's ages and sex, factors such as occupation, location and whether they live in congregate settings weren't accounted for.

其他研究人員説,以色列的數據太有限,無法得出確定的結論,正在等待同行評議的手稿。他們説,雖然政府研究人員考慮了人們的年齡和性別,但職業、地點和他們是否居住在聚集環境等因素並未被考慮在內。

Which studies should I trust? How can I know if a study is reliable?

我應該相信哪些研究?我如何知道一項研究是否可靠?

Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization at the University of Saskatchewan in Canada, recommends reading studies published in the New England Journal of Medicine, the Journal of the American Medical Association and the Lancet. For journals specific to infectious disease, she recommends Clinical Infectious Diseases and the Journal of Infectious Diseases. She also recommends people read Science, Nature, Cell and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

加拿大薩斯喀徹温大學疫苗和傳染病組織的病毒學家安吉拉·拉斯穆森(Angela Rasmussen)建議閲讀發表在《新英格蘭醫學雜誌》(The New England Journal Of Medicine)、《美國醫學會雜誌》(Journal Of The American Medical Association)和《柳葉刀》(The Lancet)上的研究。對於特定於傳染病的期刊,她推薦《臨牀傳染病》和《傳染病雜誌》。她還推薦人們閲讀《科學》、《自然》、《細胞》和《國家科學院院刊》。

Studies published in such peer-reviewed journals are evaluated by experts in that field to make sure the data presented is sound. That makes them generally more reliable than, say, a self-published paper or preprint, a paper posted online before peer review.

發表在這類同行評議期刊上的研究由該領域的專家進行評估,以確保提供的數據是正確的。這使得它們通常比自我發表的論文或預印本(在同行評審之前發佈在網上的論文)更可靠。

Preprints have attracted more public attention during the pandemic as scientists have raced to make their findings on Covid-19 public sooner. Although some preprint servers have a vetting process, the papers aren't peer reviewed the way they would be when submitted for publication in a journal, Dr. Rasmussen said.

隨着科學家們爭先恐後地在新冠肺炎上公佈他們的發現,預印本在疫情期間吸引了更多公眾的關注。拉斯穆森博士説,儘管一些印前服務器有一個審查程序,但這些論文不會像在期刊上提交發表時那樣受到同行審查。

"People should read any conclusions from a preprint with a grain of salt, " she said.

她説:“人們應該對預印本中的任何結論持保留態度。”

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

(完)道瓊通訊社

August 26, 2021 13:32 ET (17:32 GMT)

2021年8月26日美國東部時間13:32(格林尼治標準時間17:32)

Copyright (c) 2021 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

版權所有(C)2021年道瓊斯公司

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論