share_log

Opinions: SSB-maker QuantumScape is getting closer to an SSD… solid speculative play

Opinions: SSB-maker QuantumScape is getting closer to an SSD… solid speculative play

觀點:單板製造商Quantumscape離固態硬盤…越來越近紮實的投機遊戲
InvestorPlace ·  2021/08/06 10:05

Over recent publications, I’ve been generally skeptical about $QuantumScape Corp(QS.US)$. Although the company has groundbreaking potential for its research and development of solid-state batteries (SSBs), putting your money into the mix is another matter. But eventually, even something as disappointing as QS stock may get its day in the sun.

在最近的出版物中,我普遍對此持懷疑態度$Quantumscape Corp(QS.US)$。雖然該公司在固態電池(SSB)的研究和開發方面具有開創性的潛力,但將您的資金投入到這一組合中則是另一回事。但最終,即使是像QS股票這樣令人失望的股票,也可能會大放異彩。

Of course, convincing people to take a shot right now will be an extraordinarily difficult task. When I last wrote about QuantumScape in June, shares were just above $30.50. In the article a month prior to that, shares finished the day at $35.26. As I write these words, the SSB innovator’s shares closed at $21.97, a sizable drop no matter which date from the above you choose.

當然,説服人們現在就試一試將是一項異常困難的任務。我上一次寫Quantumscape是在6月份,當時股價剛剛超過30.50美元。在之前一個月的文章中,股價當天收於35.26美元。就在我寫這些話的時候,SSB創新者的股票收盤價為21.97美元,無論你選擇從上面哪個日期開始,這都是一個相當大的跌幅。

Plus, it’s tough to avoid immediacy bias in the sense that things could get worse still. Over the trailing six months, QS stock is down 49%. In the last 30 days, the stock shed 13.4%. And in the past week, shares have given up 3.22%. You see a pattern? Seemingly every time someone says the bottom is in, QS proves them wrong.

此外,很難避免直接性偏見,因為事情可能會變得更糟。在過去的六個月裏,QS的股價下跌了49%。在過去的30天裏,該股下跌了13.4%。在過去的一週裏,股價下跌了3.22%。你看到一種模式了嗎?似乎每次有人説底部已經到了,QS就證明他們錯了。

Naturally, I’m not eager to join in on the fun.

當然,我並不急於參與其中。

QS Stock Fortunes Ride on Getting SSB Right

QS股票走勢騎在正確的SSB上

While QuantumScape has plenty of supporters and science affording it pleasant vibes, its SSB journey has proven to be an incredibly challenging one. On the surface, the ability to induce far greater energy density in a battery pack would be a paradigm shift for the electric vehicle rollout.

雖然Quantumscape有大量的支持者和科學為它提供了愉快的氛圍,但它的單邊帶之旅已被證明是一次令人難以置信的具有挑戰性的旅程。從表面上看,在電池組中誘導更大的能量密度的能力將是電動汽車推出的一個範式轉變。

Yes, EVs are making do with current battery tech. But take a look at the offerings from $Tesla, Inc.(TSLA.US)$ and competing vehicles. If you want a “normally” functioning EV — that is, a vehicle that has more than one seat and four wheels — you’ve got to pay serious bucks.

是的,電動汽車正在湊合着使用目前的電池技術。但請看一下來自$Tesla,Inc.(TSLA.US)$以及相互競爭的車輛。如果你想要一輛“正常”運轉的電動汽車--也就是説,一輛有多個座位和四個輪子的汽車--你就得花大價錢。

With a U.S. median household income of less than $69,000, EVs need to get cheaper. SSB technology could be the answer.

美國中位數居家收入低於6.9萬美元的電動汽車需要變得更便宜。單邊帶技術可能是答案。

Difficulties Remain but Sub-$20 Price Is Enticing

困難依然存在,但低於20美元的價格很誘人

So, why hasn’t QS stock gone up on the implications of the underlying business? Likely, the investment community have grown skeptical of the company’s financial performance, along with strong friction on its path toward commercialization.

那麼,為什麼QS的股價沒有因基礎業務的影響而上漲呢?很可能,投資界對該公司的財務表現越來越懷疑,同時在其商業化道路上也出現了強烈的摩擦。

Now, I’m not going to trash QS stock because QuantumScape is holding back nothing. When you’re attempting to build what could be one of the most transformative inventions of the last few decades, it’s only reasonable to expect setbacks.

現在,我不會扔掉QS的股票,因為Quantumscape什麼都不會隱瞞。當你試圖創造可能是過去幾十年來最具變革性的發明之一時,期待挫折是合情合理的。

However, money changes everything. When you have a situation where stock trading on margin continues to hit record highs, QS may also be a victim of outside circumstances: as people are making money hand over fist — and darn quickly — it’s hard to keep stomaching double-digit losses.

然而,金錢改變了一切。當你面臨保證金股票交易繼續創下歷史新高的情況時,QS可能也會成為外部環境的犧牲品:由於人們賺得盆滿鉢滿--而且很快就會變得糟糕--很難繼續承受兩位數的虧損。

From that perspective, the red ink in QS stock makes sense. Maybe it’s not as terrible as its chart implies. Rather, speculators have moved onto more viable fare. But when the other flavors-of-the-week cool down, will traders return to their first love?

從這個角度來看,QS股票的赤字是有道理的。也許它並不像圖表所顯示的那樣可怕。相反,投機者已經轉向了更可行的票價。但是,當本週其他口味降温時,交易員會回到他們的初戀嗎?

Fundamentally, I’m still skeptical about QuantumScape. It’s not the only player in the SSB game. Moreover, there’s no guarantee that EV adoption will break through in the mainstream.

從根本上説,我仍然對Quantumscape持懷疑態度。它不是SSB遊戲中唯一的玩家。此外,不能保證電動汽車的採用會在主流中取得突破。

Then again, if QuantumScape manages to deliver on its promises, that adoption might happen in a hurry. Potentially, the company could foster a new way forward, where EVs are not only practical and environmentally friendly but they’re also cost-effective. In that scenario — which is a fantasy right now — QS stock would be what TSLA is today.

話又説回來,如果Quantumscape成功兑現了它的承諾,採用可能會很倉促。潛在地,該公司可以培育一條新的前進道路,在那裏電動汽車不僅實用、環保,而且性價比高。在這種情況下-這是目前的幻想-QS股票將是今天的TSLA。

Now, at a ticket price of $132 or so, that’s not something that investors could accept. But something under $20 as my InvestorPlace colleague Will Ashworth wrote about? Yes, I think a lot of people could wrap their heads around that.

現在,在132美元左右的票價下,這是投資者無法接受的。但是20美元以下的東西是我的InvestorPlace同事威爾·阿什沃斯寫道?是的,我想很多人都能理解這一點。

A Much Smarter Speculative Bet

更聰明的投機賭注

I’m not just saying that QS stock is a worthwhile bet now that the circumstances have changed dramatically. Thinking aloud to myself while writing these words, QuantumScape is at a much more attractive valuation, providing upside potential — and that is the operative word here, potential — at a reasonable price.

我並不是説QS股票是一個值得的賭注,因為現在的情況已經發生了戲劇性的變化。在寫這些話的時候,我自言自語,Quantumscape的估值更具吸引力,提供了上行潛力--這是這裏的關鍵詞。潛力--價格合理。

Still, no investment is without risks. For me, aside from the competitive threat, QS stock faces two headwinds: a race against time and a battle for capacity. In other words, the cost of EV batteries are coming down every year, which means that manufacturers can offer more capacity for less money. Thus, QuantumScape needs to deliver something substantive and something soon.

儘管如此,沒有一項投資是沒有風險的。對我來説,除了競爭威脅,QS股票還面臨着兩個不利因素:與時間賽跑和容量爭奪戰。換句話説,電動汽車電池的成本每年都在下降,這意味着製造商可以用更少的錢提供更大的容量。因此,Quantumscape需要儘快推出一些實質性的產品。

Otherwise, the natural course of innovation might make its SSB obsolete if the cost-for-performance ratio doesn’t stack up. Actually, that’s always been the risk and investors have been pondering what discount is appropriate to take against QuantumScape’s intrinsic value. At $20 or less, perhaps the price is finally right.

否則,如果性價比達不到要求,自然的創新過程可能會讓它的SSB過時。事實上,這一直是一個風險,投資者一直在思考,相對於Quantumscape的內在價值,什麼樣的折扣才是合適的。在20美元或更低的價格下,或許這個價格最終是合適的。

On the date of publication, Josh Enomoto did not have (either directly or indirectly) any positions in the securities mentioned in this article. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the writer, subject to the InvestorPlace.com Publishing Guidelines.

在出版之日,喬什·恩諾本(Josh Enomoto)沒有(直接或間接)持有本文所述證券的任何頭寸。本文表達的觀點是作者的觀點,以InvestorPlace.com為準出版指南.

A former senior business analyst for Sony Electronics, Josh Enomoto has helped broker major contracts with Fortune Global 500 companies. Over the past several years, he has delivered unique, critical insights for the investment markets, as well as various other industries including legal, construction management, and healthcare.

曾擔任索尼電子(Sony Electronics)高級商業分析師的喬什·內本(Josh Enomoto)曾幫助撮合過財富全球500強(Fortune Global 500)公司的重大合同。在過去的幾年裏,他為投資市場以及包括法律、建築管理和醫療保健在內的各種其他行業提供了獨特的、至關重要的見解。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論