share_log

Retail Investors Invested in Inspur Electronic Information Industry Co., Ltd. (SZSE:000977) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥5.2b Market Cap Decline

Retail Investors Invested in Inspur Electronic Information Industry Co., Ltd. (SZSE:000977) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥5.2b Market Cap Decline

投資浪潮電子信息產業有限公司(深圳證券交易所代碼:000977)的散戶投資者首當其衝地應對了上週52億元人民幣市值下跌的衝擊
Simply Wall St ·  04/06 20:22

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Inspur Electronic Information Industry's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 45% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • 19% of Inspur Electronic Information Industry is held by Institutions
  • 浪潮電子信息行業擁有大量散戶投資者的所有權,這表明關鍵決策受到廣大公衆股東的影響
  • 45% 的業務由前 25 名股東持有
  • 浪潮電子信息行業19%的股份由機構持有

Every investor in Inspur Electronic Information Industry Co., Ltd. (SZSE:000977) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 48% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

浪潮電子信息產業有限公司(SZSE: 000977)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,散戶投資者擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲48%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

And last week, retail investors endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 8.3%.

上週,散戶投資者遭受了最大的損失,該股下跌了8.3%。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Inspur Electronic Information Industry.

在下圖中,我們放大了浪潮電子信息行業的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:000977 Ownership Breakdown April 7th 2024
SZSE: 000977 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 7 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Inspur Electronic Information Industry?

關於浪潮電子信息行業,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

We can see that Inspur Electronic Information Industry does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Inspur Electronic Information Industry, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,浪潮電子信息行業確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下浪潮電子信息行業過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:000977 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 7th 2024
SZSE: 000977 2024年4月7日收益和收入增長

Inspur Electronic Information Industry is not owned by hedge funds. Inspur Group Limited is currently the company's largest shareholder with 32% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 1.2% and 1.1% of the stock.

浪潮電子信息產業不歸對沖基金所有。浪潮集團有限公司目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份的32%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約1.2%和1.1%的股份。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

在研究我們的所有權數據時,我們發現25位大股東共同擁有的股份不到50%,這意味着沒有一個人擁有多數股權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Inspur Electronic Information Industry

浪潮電子信息行業的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Inspur Electronic Information Industry Co., Ltd. in their own names. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own CN¥106m worth of shares (at current prices). In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的數據表明,內部人士以自己的名義擁有浪潮電子信息產業有限公司不到1%的股份。但是,內部人士有可能通過更復雜的結構獲得間接利益。這是一家非常大的公司,因此看到內部人士擁有該公司的很大一部分股份會令人驚訝。儘管他們的持股量不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共同擁有價值1.06億元人民幣的股票(按當前價格計算)。在這種情況下,看看這些內部人士是在買入還是賣出可能會更有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 48% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司48%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 32%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的32%。僅從這一事實中很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究一下誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過獨立的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Inspur Electronic Information Industry is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those shouldn't be ignored...

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。請注意,浪潮電子信息行業在我們的投資分析中顯示出3個警告信號,其中一個不容忽視...

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論