share_log

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Genius Sports Limited (NYSE:GENI) With 51% Ownership

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Genius Sports Limited (NYSE:GENI) With 51% Ownership

機構投資者非常依賴擁有51%所有權的Genius Sports Limited(紐約證券交易所代碼:GENI)
Simply Wall St ·  04/06 10:49

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Genius Sports implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 7 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Insiders own 12% of Genius Sports
  • 各機構對Genius Sports的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 前7名股東擁有公司51%的股份
  • 業內人士擁有天才體育12%的股份

A look at the shareholders of Genius Sports Limited (NYSE:GENI) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 51% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看Genius Sports Limited(紐約證券交易所代碼:GENI)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲51%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 8.4% last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 39%.

結果,在上週公司股價上漲8.4%之後,機構投資者獲得了最大的回報。上週的漲勢將進一步提振目前爲39%的股東一年回報率。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Genius Sports.

在下圖中,我們放大了Genius Sports的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:GENI Ownership Breakdown April 6th 2024
紐約證券交易所:GENI 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 6 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Genius Sports?

關於Genius Sports,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

We can see that Genius Sports does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Genius Sports, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,Genius Sports確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看Genius Sports過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:GENI Earnings and Revenue Growth April 6th 2024
紐約證券交易所:GENI 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 6 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. It would appear that 9.9% of Genius Sports shares are controlled by hedge funds. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Apax Partners LLP with 15% of shares outstanding. With 9.9% and 9.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, Caledonia (Private) Investments Pty Limited and Mark Locke are the second and third largest shareholders. Mark Locke, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。看來Genius Sports9.9%的股票由對沖基金控制。這引起了我的注意,因爲對沖基金有時會試圖影響管理層,或者帶來能夠爲股東創造短期價值的變革。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是Apax Partners LLP,已發行股份的15%。喀裏多尼亞(私人)投資私人有限公司和馬克·洛克分別擁有9.9%和9.2%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。第三大股東馬克·洛克也恰好擁有董事會成員的頭銜。

We did some more digging and found that 7 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進一步挖掘發現,大股東中有7人約佔登記冊的51%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Genius Sports

Genius Sports的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Genius Sports Limited. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.2b, and insiders have US$143m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有Genius Sports Limited的大量股份。它的市值僅爲12億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值1.43億美元的股票。這非常重要。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 12% stake in Genius Sports. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Genius Sports12%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With a stake of 15%, private equity firms could influence the Genius Sports board. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股權公司持有15%的股份,可能會影響Genius Sports董事會。有時我們會看到私募股權長期存在,但總的來說,它們的投資期限較短,而且顧名思義,對上市公司的投資並不多。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售資本並將其重新部署到其他地方。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他更爲重要的因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

我喜歡更深入地了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問這張過去的收益、收入和現金流的交互式圖表。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論