share_log

After Losing 39% in the Past Year, Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (NASDAQ:CLNE) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain

After Losing 39% in the Past Year, Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (NASDAQ:CLNE) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain

在過去一年中虧損了39%之後,清潔能源燃料公司(納斯達克股票代碼:CLNE)的機構所有者必須對最近的漲勢感到寬慰
Simply Wall St ·  04/01 09:23

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Clean Energy Fuels' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 8 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,清潔能源燃料的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 前 8 名股東擁有公司 50% 的股份
  • 使用分析師預測的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現

A look at the shareholders of Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (NASDAQ:CLNE) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 51% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看清潔能源燃料公司(納斯達克股票代碼:CLNE)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲51%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。

Institutional investors would appreciate the 11% increase in share price last week, given their one-year losses have totalled a disappointing 39%.

機構投資者將對上週股價上漲11%表示讚賞,因爲他們一年的虧損總額達到令人失望的39%。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Clean Energy Fuels, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究清潔能源燃料的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:CLNE Ownership Breakdown April 1st 2024
納斯達克GS:CLNE所有權明細 2024年4月1日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Clean Energy Fuels?

關於清潔能源燃料,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Clean Energy Fuels. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Clean Energy Fuels' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如您所見,機構投資者在清潔能源燃料中擁有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看清潔能源燃料的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:CLNE Earnings and Revenue Growth April 1st 2024
納斯達克GS:CLNE收益和收入增長 2024年4月1日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Clean Energy Fuels. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is TotalEnergies SE with 19% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.2% and 6.6% of the stock. Furthermore, CEO Andrew Littlefair is the owner of 0.6% of the company's shares.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。對沖基金在清潔能源燃料中的股票不多。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是TotalEnergies SE,已發行股份的19%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約7.2%和6.6%的股份。此外,首席執行官安德魯·利特爾費爾持有該公司0.6%的股份。

We also observed that the top 8 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前8名股東佔股票登記冊的一半以上,少數規模較小的股東可以在一定程度上平衡大股東的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Clean Energy Fuels

清潔能源燃料的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Clean Energy Fuels Corp.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$10m worth of the US$598m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有清潔能源燃料公司的部分股份。作爲個人,內部人士共同擁有這家價值5.98億美元的公司價值1000萬美元。很高興看到內部人士進行一些投資,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 29% stake in Clean Energy Fuels. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有清潔能源燃料29%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

Public companies currently own 19% of Clean Energy Fuels stock. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

上市公司目前擁有清潔能源燃料19%的股票。這可能是戰略利益,兩家公司可能有相關的商業利益。可能是他們已經融合了。這一裁定可能值得進一步調查。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Clean Energy Fuels .

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。爲此,你應該注意我們在清潔能源燃料中發現的1個警告標誌。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論