share_log

We Think You Can Look Beyond Scholastic's (NASDAQ:SCHL) Lackluster Earnings

We Think You Can Look Beyond Scholastic's (NASDAQ:SCHL) Lackluster Earnings

我們認爲你可以將目光投向Scholastic(納斯達克股票代碼:SCHL)乏善可陳的收益
Simply Wall St ·  03/29 06:55

Soft earnings didn't appear to concern Scholastic Corporation's (NASDAQ:SCHL) shareholders over the last week. We did some digging, and we believe the earnings are stronger than they seem.

上週,疲軟的收益似乎並不令Scholastic Corporation(納斯達克股票代碼:SCHL)的股東感到擔憂。我們進行了一些挖掘,我們認爲收益比看起來要強勁。

earnings-and-revenue-history
NasdaqGS:SCHL Earnings and Revenue History March 29th 2024
納斯達克GS: SCHL 收益和收入歷史記錄 2024 年 3 月 29 日

The Impact Of Unusual Items On Profit

不尋常物品對利潤的影響

To properly understand Scholastic's profit results, we need to consider the US$7.6m expense attributed to unusual items. While deductions due to unusual items are disappointing in the first instance, there is a silver lining. We looked at thousands of listed companies and found that unusual items are very often one-off in nature. And that's hardly a surprise given these line items are considered unusual. If Scholastic doesn't see those unusual expenses repeat, then all else being equal we'd expect its profit to increase over the coming year.

爲了正確了解Scholastic的利潤業績,我們需要考慮歸因於不尋常項目的760萬美元支出。儘管由於不尋常項目而產生的扣除首先令人失望,但有一線希望。我們調查了數千家上市公司,發現不尋常的物品本質上往往是一次性的。鑑於這些單列項目被認爲不尋常,這並不奇怪。如果Scholastic認爲這些不尋常的支出不會重演,那麼在其他條件相同的情況下,我們預計其利潤將在來年增加。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

這可能會讓你想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以單擊此處查看根據他們的估計描繪未來盈利能力的交互式圖表。

Our Take On Scholastic's Profit Performance

我們對Scholastic利潤表現的看法

Because unusual items detracted from Scholastic's earnings over the last year, you could argue that we can expect an improved result in the current quarter. Because of this, we think Scholastic's earnings potential is at least as good as it seems, and maybe even better! On the other hand, its EPS actually shrunk in the last twelve months. The goal of this article has been to assess how well we can rely on the statutory earnings to reflect the company's potential, but there is plenty more to consider. While it's really important to consider how well a company's statutory earnings represent its true earnings power, it's also worth taking a look at what analysts are forecasting for the future. Luckily, you can check out what analysts are forecasting by clicking here.

由於不尋常的項目削弱了Scholastic去年的收益,你可能會爭辯說,我們可以預期本季度的業績會有所改善。因此,我們認爲Scholastic的盈利潛力至少和看起來一樣好,甚至可能更好!另一方面,其每股收益實際上在過去十二個月中萎縮了。本文的目標是評估我們在多大程度上可以依靠法定收益來反映公司的潛力,但還有很多需要考慮的地方。儘管考慮公司的法定收益如何代表其真正的盈利能力非常重要,但也值得一看分析師對未來的預測。幸運的是,您可以點擊此處查看分析師的預測。

This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of Scholastic's profit. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks that insiders are buying to be useful.

這份報告只研究了揭示Scholastic利潤性質的單一因素。但是,還有很多其他方法可以讓你對公司的看法。例如,許多人認爲高股本回報率是有利的商業經濟的標誌,而另一些人則喜歡 “關注資金”,尋找內部人士正在買入的股票。雖然可能需要你進行一些研究,但你可能會發現這份免費收集的擁有高股本回報率的公司,或者這份內部人士正在購買的股票清單很有用。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論