share_log

Private Companies Are Shenzhen International Holdings Limited's (HKG:152) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped HK$790m

Private Companies Are Shenzhen International Holdings Limited's (HKG:152) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped HK$790m

私營公司是深圳國際控股有限公司(HKG: 152)的最大所有者,在市值下降7.9億港元后受到打擊
Simply Wall St ·  02/15 19:25

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in Shenzhen International Holdings indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • 私營公司對深圳國際控股的大量所有權表明,他們在管理和業務戰略方面集體擁有更大的發言權。
  • 52% 的業務由前兩名股東持有
  • 內部人士最近買了

Every investor in Shenzhen International Holdings Limited (HKG:152) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 44% to be precise, is private companies. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

深圳國際控股有限公司(HKG: 152)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。持有該公司股份最多的集團是私營公司,準確地說約爲44%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And following last week's 5.2% decline in share price, private companies suffered the most losses.

繼上週股價下跌5.2%之後,私營公司遭受的損失最大。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Shenzhen International Holdings.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關深圳國際控股的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:152 Ownership Breakdown February 16th 2024
SEHK: 152 所有權明細 2024 年 2 月 16 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shenzhen International Holdings?

機構所有權告訴我們關於深圳國際控股的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

Shenzhen International Holdings already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Shenzhen International Holdings' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

深圳國際控股公司已經在股份登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到深圳國際控股的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:152 Earnings and Revenue Growth February 16th 2024
SEHK: 152 2024 年 2 月 16 日的收益和收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Shenzhen International Holdings. Shenzhen Investment Management Corporation is currently the largest shareholder, with 44% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.5% and 2.5% of the stock.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對深圳國際控股進行有意義的投資。深圳投資管理公司目前是最大股東,已發行股份的44%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約7.5%和2.5%的股份。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 52% stake.

對股東登記冊的更詳細研究表明,前兩名股東通過其52%的股份擁有公司的大量所有權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Shenzhen International Holdings

深圳國際控股的內部人所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Shenzhen International Holdings Limited in their own names. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own HK$14m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的數據顯示,內部人士以自己的名義擁有深圳國際控股有限公司不到1%的股份。但是,他們可能會通過我們尚未掌握的公司結構獲得間接利益。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士擁有價值1400萬港元的股票。絕對值可能比比例份額更重要。看到至少有一部分內部所有權總是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 35% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Shenzhen International Holdings. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

深圳國際控股擁有35%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對深圳國際控股有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 44%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們可以看到,私營公司擁有已發行股份的44%。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果內部人士等關聯方對其中一傢俬營公司感興趣,則應在年度報告中披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Shenzhen International Holdings better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Shenzhen International Holdings is showing 4 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those makes us a bit uncomfortable...

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,要更好地了解深圳國際控股,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意,深圳國際控股在我們的投資分析中顯示了4個警告信號,其中一個讓我們有點不舒服...

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論