share_log

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE:SF) With 86% Ownership

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE:SF) With 86% Ownership

機構投資者對擁有86%所有權的Stifel Financial Corp.(紐約證券交易所代碼:SF)深感信心
Simply Wall St ·  02/09 07:50

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Stifel Financial's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 15 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,Stifel Financial的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 前15名股東擁有公司51%的股份
  • 內部人士最近的銷售情況

A look at the shareholders of Stifel Financial Corp. (NYSE:SF) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 86% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看Stifel Financial Corp.(紐約證券交易所代碼:SF)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲86%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$7.6b in market cap. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 17%.

上週,在該公司的市值達到76億美元之後,機構投資者最終受益最大。上週的漲勢將進一步提振目前爲17%的股東一年回報率。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Stifel Financial, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Stifel Financial的每種所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:SF Ownership Breakdown February 9th 2024
紐約證券交易所:SF 所有權明細 2024 年 2 月 9 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Stifel Financial?

關於Stifel Financial,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

We can see that Stifel Financial does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Stifel Financial's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,Stifel Financial確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Stifel Financial的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:SF Earnings and Revenue Growth February 9th 2024
紐約證券交易所:SF 收益和收入增長 2024 年 2 月 9 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Stifel Financial. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 10% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.9% and 6.0% of the stock. Furthermore, CEO Ronald Kruszewski is the owner of 1.4% of the company's shares.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對Stifel Financial進行有意義的投資。我們的數據顯示,Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大股東,已發行股份的10%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約8.9%和6.0%的股份。此外,首席執行官羅納德·克魯謝夫斯基是該公司1.4%股份的所有者。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 15 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步的挖掘,我們發現排名前15位的公司合併所有權爲51%,這表明沒有一個股東對公司擁有重要的控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Stifel Financial

Stifel Financial 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Stifel Financial Corp.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$277m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的最新數據顯示,內部人士擁有Stifel Financial Corp的部分股份。內部人士持有價值2.77億美元的大量股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個真正的積極因素。很高興看到內部人士的這種投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 10% stake in Stifel Financial. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Stifel Financial10%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Stifel Financial you should know about.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,考慮風險。每家公司都有它們,我們發現了兩個你應該知道的Stifel Financial警告信號。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論