share_log

Insiders At New York Times Sold US$3.9m In Stock, Alluding To Potential Weakness

Insiders At New York Times Sold US$3.9m In Stock, Alluding To Potential Weakness

《紐約時報》的內部人士出售了390萬美元的股票,暗示了潛在的疲軟
Simply Wall St ·  01/03 14:08

Many The New York Times Company (NYSE:NYT) insiders ditched their stock over the past year, which may be of interest to the company's shareholders. When evaluating insider transactions, knowing whether insiders are buying versus if they selling is usually more beneficial, as the latter can be open to many interpretations. However, if numerous insiders are selling, shareholders should investigate more.

在過去的一年中,許多紐約時報公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:NYT)內部人士拋售了股票,這可能會引起該公司的股東的興趣。在評估內幕交易時,了解內部人士是買入還是賣出通常更有利,因爲後者可能有多種解釋。但是,如果有許多內部人士出售,股東應該進行更多調查。

Although we don't think shareholders should simply follow insider transactions, logic dictates you should pay some attention to whether insiders are buying or selling shares.

儘管我們認爲股東不應該簡單地關注內幕交易,但邏輯要求你應該注意內部人士是在買入還是賣出股票。

Check out our latest analysis for New York Times

查看我們對《紐約時報》的最新分析

New York Times Insider Transactions Over The Last Year

《紐約時報》去年的內幕交易

In the last twelve months, the biggest single sale by an insider was when the CEO, President & Director, Meredith Kopit Levien, sold US$1.2m worth of shares at a price of US$40.05 per share. So it's clear an insider wanted to take some cash off the table, even below the current price of US$47.86. As a general rule we consider it to be discouraging when insiders are selling below the current price, because it suggests they were happy with a lower valuation. While insider selling is not a positive sign, we can't be sure if it does mean insiders think the shares are fully valued, so it's only a weak sign. It is worth noting that this sale was only 33% of Meredith Kopit Levien's holding.

在過去的十二個月中,內部人士最大的一次出售是首席執行官、總裁兼董事梅雷迪思·科皮特·萊維恩以每股40.05美元的價格出售了價值120萬美元的股票。因此,很明顯,一位內部人士想從桌上提取一些現金,甚至低於目前的47.86美元。通常,當內部人士以低於當前價格的價格出售時,我們認爲這令人沮喪,因爲這表明他們對較低的估值感到滿意。儘管內幕拋售不是一個積極的信號,但我們無法確定這是否意味着內部人士認爲股票已完全估值,因此這只是一個弱勢信號。值得注意的是,此次出售僅佔梅雷迪思·科皮特·萊維恩持股量的33%。

In the last year New York Times insiders didn't buy any company stock. You can see the insider transactions (by companies and individuals) over the last year depicted in the chart below. If you click on the chart, you can see all the individual transactions, including the share price, individual, and the date!

去年,《紐約時報》內部人士沒有購買任何公司股票。您可以看到下圖所示的去年的內幕交易(公司和個人)。如果你點擊圖表,你可以看到所有的個人交易,包括股價、個人和日期!

insider-trading-volume
NYSE:NYT Insider Trading Volume January 3rd 2024
紐約證券交易所:紐約時報內幕交易量 2024 年 1 月 3 日

I will like New York Times better if I see some big insider buys. While we wait, check out this free list of growing companies with considerable, recent, insider buying.

如果我看到一些重大的內幕收購,我會更喜歡《紐約時報》。在我們等待的同時,請查看這份免費清單,列出了最近有大量內幕收購的成長型公司。

Insider Ownership Of New York Times

《紐約時報》的內部所有權

Many investors like to check how much of a company is owned by insiders. Usually, the higher the insider ownership, the more likely it is that insiders will be incentivised to build the company for the long term. It appears that New York Times insiders own 0.6% of the company, worth about US$47m. This level of insider ownership is good but just short of being particularly stand-out. It certainly does suggest a reasonable degree of alignment.

許多投資者喜歡檢查一家公司有多少股份由內部人士擁有。通常,內部人士的所有權越高,內部人士長期建立公司的可能性就越大。看來《紐約時報》內部人士擁有該公司0.6%的股份,價值約4700萬美元。這種內部所有權水平不錯,但還沒有特別突出。這無疑表明了一定程度的一致性。

So What Does This Data Suggest About New York Times Insiders?

那麼,這些數據對《紐約時報》內部人士有什麼啓示?

It doesn't really mean much that no insider has traded New York Times shares in the last quarter. We don't take much encouragement from the transactions by New York Times insiders. The modest level of insider ownership is, at least, some comfort. Of course, the future is what matters most. So if you are interested in New York Times, you should check out this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

上個季度沒有內部人士交易《紐約時報》的股票,這並不意味着什麼。我們並沒有從《紐約時報》內部人士的交易中得到太多鼓勵。內部所有權的適度水平至少讓人感到欣慰。當然,未來才是最重要的。因此,如果您對《紐約時報》感興趣,則應查看這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告。

Of course New York Times may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of high quality companies.

當然,《紐約時報》可能不是最值得購買的股票。因此,您可能希望看到這個免費的高質量公司集合。

For the purposes of this article, insiders are those individuals who report their transactions to the relevant regulatory body. We currently account for open market transactions and private dispositions of direct interests only, but not derivative transactions or indirect interests.

就本文而言,內部人士是那些向相關監管機構報告交易的個人。我們目前僅對公開市場交易和直接權益的私人處置進行覈算,但不包括衍生品交易或間接權益。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論