share_log

Royale Home Holdings Limited's (HKG:1198) Market Cap Rose HK$806m Last Week; Private Companies Who Hold 48% Profited and so Did Insiders

Royale Home Holdings Limited's (HKG:1198) Market Cap Rose HK$806m Last Week; Private Companies Who Hold 48% Profited and so Did Insiders

皇家家居控股有限公司(HKG: 1198)市值上週上漲8.06億港元;持有48%的私營公司獲利,內部人士也是如此
Simply Wall St ·  2023/12/28 17:58

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in Royale Home Holdings indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 75% ownership
  • Insider ownership in Royale Home Holdings is 27%
  • 私營公司對Royale Home Holdings的大量所有權表明,它們在管理和業務戰略中集體擁有更大的發言權
  • 共有2名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,擁有75%的所有權
  • Royale Home Holdings的內部所有權爲27%

Every investor in Royale Home Holdings Limited (HKG:1198) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 48% to be precise, is private companies. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

皇家家居控股有限公司(HKG: 1198)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。持有該公司股份最多的集團是私營公司,準確地說約爲48%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

While private companies were the group that benefitted the most from last week's HK$806m market cap gain, insiders too had a 27% share in those profits.

儘管私營公司是從上週8.06億港元的市值增長中受益最大的群體,但內部人士在這些利潤中也佔有27%的份額。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Royale Home Holdings.

在下圖中,我們放大了皇家家居控股的不同所有權群體。

Check out our latest analysis for Royale Home Holdings

查看我們對皇家家居控股的最新分析

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:1198 Ownership Breakdown December 28th 2023
SEHK: 1198 所有權明細 2023 年 12 月 28 日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Royale Home Holdings?

關於皇家家居控股,缺乏機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

機構投資者通常會避開規模太小、流動性太差或風險太大的公司,不符合他們的口味。但是,看到沒有任何機構投資者的大型公司是不尋常的。

There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Royale Home Holdings might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.

機構爲何不擁有股票,有多種解釋。最常見的情況是,公司相對於所管理的資金來說規模太小,因此該機構不願仔細研究該公司。或者,該公司的某些方面可能使機構投資者望而卻步。Royale Home Holdings可能沒有機構想要的那種過去的業績,或者他們可能根本沒有仔細研究該業務。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:1198 Earnings and Revenue Growth December 28th 2023
SEHK: 1198 2023年12月28日收益及收入增長

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Royale Home Holdings. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Guangzhou Hi-Tech Industry Development Zone Administration Committee with 48% of shares outstanding. With 27% and 0.1% of the shares outstanding respectively, Kam-Pang Tse and Man Yiu Yue are the second and third largest shareholders. Interestingly, the bottom two of the top three shareholders also hold the title of Top Key Executive and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively, suggesting that these insiders have a personal stake in the company.

對沖基金在皇家家居控股的股份不多。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是廣州高新技術產業開發區管理委員會,已發行股份的48%。謝錦鵬和余文耀分別擁有27%和0.1%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。有趣的是,前三名股東中倒數第二的股東還分別擁有最高關鍵高管和董事會成員的頭銜,這表明這些內部人士在公司擁有個人股份。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前兩名股東擁有公司的多數股權,這意味着他們足夠強大,足以影響公司的決策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解公衆輿論也是有意義的。據我們所知,分析師對該公司沒有報道,因此它可能被忽視了。

Insider Ownership Of Royale Home Holdings

皇家家居控股的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,確實因司法管轄區而異。我們的數據反映了個別內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Royale Home Holdings Limited. Insiders have a HK$1.1b stake in this HK$4.0b business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

內部人士似乎擁有皇家家居控股有限公司的很大一部分股份。業內人士在這項40億港元的業務中持有11億港元的股份。我們可以說這表明了與股東的一致性,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然很小;一些內部人士可能已經創立了該公司。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 25% stake in Royale Home Holdings. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有皇家家居控股25%的股份。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 48%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有公司48%的股份。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過控股私營公司而對上市公司擁有權益,而不是以個人身份擁有權益。儘管很難得出任何寬泛的結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Royale Home Holdings better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Royale Home Holdings .

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解Royale Home Holdings,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,你應該注意我們在皇家家居控股公司發現的1個警告標誌。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

當然,這可能不是最值得購買的股票。因此,請看看這份有趣的公司的免費免費清單。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論