share_log

Samson Holding's (HKG:531) Solid Profits Have Weak Fundamentals

Samson Holding's (HKG:531) Solid Profits Have Weak Fundamentals

Samson Holding(HKG:531)穩健的利潤基本面疲軟
Simply Wall St ·  2022/04/19 20:11

Unsurprisingly, Samson Holding Ltd.'s (HKG:531) stock price was strong on the back of its healthy earnings report. However, our analysis suggests that shareholders may be missing some factors that indicate the earnings result was not as good as it looked.

不出所料,Samson Holding Ltd.(HKG:531)憑藉健康的盈利報告,股價表現強勁。然而,我們的分析表明,股東可能遺漏了一些表明盈利結果並不像看起來那麼好的因素。

Check out our latest analysis for Samson Holding

查看我們對Samson Holding的最新分析

SEHK:531 Earnings and Revenue History April 19th 2022
聯交所:531盈利及收入歷史2022年4月19日

The Impact Of Unusual Items On Profit

異常項目對利潤的影響

To properly understand Samson Holding's profit results, we need to consider the US$5.3m gain attributed to unusual items. We can't deny that higher profits generally leave us optimistic, but we'd prefer it if the profit were to be sustainable. We ran the numbers on most publicly listed companies worldwide, and it's very common for unusual items to be once-off in nature. Which is hardly surprising, given the name. We can see that Samson Holding's positive unusual items were quite significant relative to its profit in the year to December 2021. All else being equal, this would likely have the effect of making the statutory profit a poor guide to underlying earnings power.

為了正確理解Samson Holding的利潤業績,我們需要考慮歸因於異常項目的530萬美元收益。我們不能否認,更高的利潤通常會讓我們保持樂觀,但如果利潤是可持續的,我們更願意這樣做。我們對全球大多數上市公司進行了統計,不尋常的項目在性質上是一次性的,這是非常常見的。考慮到這個名字,這並不令人驚訝。我們可以看到,Samson Holding的積極異常項目與其截至2021年12月的年度利潤相比相當重要。在其他條件不變的情況下,這可能會使法定利潤成為衡量潛在盈利能力的糟糕指標。

Note: we always recommend investors check balance sheet strength. Click here to be taken to our balance sheet analysis of Samson Holding.

注:我們總是建議投資者檢查資產負債表的實力。點擊此處查看我們對Samson Holding的資產負債表分析。

Our Take On Samson Holding's Profit Performance

我們對Samson Holding的利潤表現的看法

As we discussed above, we think the significant positive unusual item makes Samson Holding's earnings a poor guide to its underlying profitability. For this reason, we think that Samson Holding's statutory profits may be a bad guide to its underlying earnings power, and might give investors an overly positive impression of the company. On the bright side, the company showed enough improvement to book a profit this year, after losing money last year. Of course, we've only just scratched the surface when it comes to analysing its earnings; one could also consider margins, forecast growth, and return on investment, among other factors. So while earnings quality is important, it's equally important to consider the risks facing Samson Holding at this point in time. Every company has risks, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for Samson Holding (of which 1 is significant!) you should know about.

正如我們上面討論的,我們認為這一重要的積極的不尋常項目使Samson Holding的收益不能很好地反映其潛在的盈利能力。出於這個原因,我們認為Samson Holding的法定利潤可能是其潛在盈利能力的不良指引,可能會給投資者帶來對該公司過於樂觀的印象。好的一面是,該公司在去年虧損後,表現出了足夠的改善,今年實現了盈利。當然,當談到分析其收益時,我們只是觸及了皮毛;人們還可以考慮利潤率、預測增長和投資回報等因素。因此,儘管收益質量很重要,但考慮到Samson Holding目前面臨的風險也同樣重要。每家公司都有風險,我們發現了Samson Holding的4個警告信號(其中1個是重要的!)你應該知道。

This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of Samson Holding's profit. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks that insiders are buying to be useful.

這份報告只關注了一個因素,它揭示了Samson Holding的利潤性質。但如果你有能力將注意力集中在細枝末節上,總會有更多的東西需要發現。例如,許多人認為高股本回報率是有利的商業經濟指標,而另一些人則喜歡“跟着錢走”,尋找內部人士正在買入的股票。雖然這可能需要為您做一些研究,但您可能會發現免費擁有高股本回報率的公司的集合,或者是內部人士購買的有用的股票清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
這篇由《華爾街日報》撰寫的文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。簡單地説,華爾街在提到的任何股票中都沒有頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論