share_log

Biohaven's Nurtec ODT Garners Greater Early-Line Use as a Preventive Therapy Among Patients with Less Severe Migraine Compared to Eli Lilly's Emgality, According to Spherix Patient-Level Data

Biohaven's Nurtec ODT Garners Greater Early-Line Use as a Preventive Therapy Among Patients with Less Severe Migraine Compared to Eli Lilly's Emgality, According to Spherix Patient-Level Data

根據Spherix患者水平的數據,與禮來公司的Emgality相比,Bioaven的Nurtec ODT在偏頭痛較輕的患者中獲得了更大的早期預防性治療。
PR Newswire ·  2021/09/23 07:32

EXTON, Pa., Sept. 23, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- Just weeks after the FDA approval of Nurtec ODT's label expansion for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine, Eli Lilly announced initiation of a head-to-head Phase IV trial comparing their Emgality to Biohaven's gepant in patients with episodic migraine by the end of this year. With all metrics pointing to extremely strong uptake of Nurtec ODT in the prevention segment, Eli Lilly is looking to proactively defend their brand's opportunity within the market, while also adding to the body of scientific evidence supporting the role of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in migraine.

賓夕法尼亞州埃克斯頓9月2021年2月23日/美通社/--就在FDA批准Nurtec ODT的標籤擴展用於預防治療發作性偏頭痛幾周後,禮來公司宣佈在今年年底前啟動一項面對面的IV期試驗,比較他們與Bioaven公司的Gepant在發作性偏頭痛患者中的有效性。由於所有指標都表明Nurtec ODT在預防領域具有極強的吸引力,禮來公司正在尋求積極捍衞其品牌在市場中的機會,同時也增加了支持降鈣素基因相關肽(CGRP)在偏頭痛中的作用的科學證據。

In the third annual audit included in Spherix's RealWorld Dynamix™: Preventive Treatment in Migraine (US) service, 221 neurologists and migraine specialists provided data on 1,013 patients. The patients included in the study were prescribed Nurtec ODT, Emgality, Amgen's Aimovig, Teva's Ajovy, Lundbeck's Vyepti, or AbbVie's (formerly Allergan, an AbbVie company) Botox for the preventive treatment of migraine no more than three months prior to the July 2021 fielding.

在Spherix的第三次年度審計中Realworld Dynamix™:偏頭痛的預防性治療(美國)在這項服務中,221名神經科醫生和偏頭痛專家提供了1013名患者的數據。參加研究的患者在2021年7月就診前不超過3個月,服用Nurtec ODT、Emgality、Amgen‘s Aimovig、Teva’s Ajovy、Lundbeck‘s Vyepti或AbbVie’s(前Allergan,AbbVie公司)肉毒桿菌預防治療偏頭痛。

According to the chart audit data, Nurtec ODT-treated patients were almost twice as likely to be diagnosed with low frequency episodic migraine – in line with the gepant's approved prevention indication for episodic migraine. In comparison, close to one-third of patients recently prescribed Emgality were diagnosed with chronic migraine.

根據圖表審計數據,接受Nurtec ODT治療的患者被診斷為低頻率發作性偏頭痛的可能性幾乎是前者的兩倍,這與Gepant批准的預防發作性偏頭痛的適應症是一致的。相比之下,最近服用Emgality的患者中有近三分之一被診斷為慢性偏頭痛。

Consistent with this pattern, Emgality-treated patients were more likely to have typically severe migraine attacks and to have a 21+ score on the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire, reflecting severe or very severe migraine-related disability at the time of the brand selection. Indeed, almost two out of five patients were considered occupationally disabled due to migraine when prescribed Emgality.

與這一模式一致,接受Emgality治療的患者更有可能出現典型的嚴重偏頭痛發作,並在偏頭痛殘疾評估(MIDAS)問卷上獲得21+分,這反映了在選擇品牌時與偏頭痛相關的嚴重或非常嚴重的殘疾。事實上,當開出Emgality處方時,幾乎五分之二的患者被認為是由於偏頭痛而導致的職業性殘疾。

The decision to make a change to the patient's preventive therapy regimen, whether by initiating preventive treatment for the first time or by prescribing a new option, was driven by efficacy needs in the majority of audited cases. The leading efficacy-related factor was prolonged or increased duration of migraine attacks when prescribed Emgality and persistently high or worsening migraine severity when prescribed Nurtec ODT. Reasons other than efficacy that were relevant for regimen changes toward Emgality included patient request, tolerability, and sample availability. 

改變患者的預防治療方案的決定,無論是通過第一次開始預防性治療還是通過開出新的選擇,都是由大多數審計病例的療效需求推動的。首屈一指的療效相關因素是在處方中使用Emgality時偏頭痛發作的持續時間延長或延長,而在使用Nurtec ODT時偏頭痛的嚴重程度持續較高或惡化。除了療效以外,與EMEGALITY方案改變相關的其他原因包括患者要求、耐受性和樣本可獲得性。

Likely benefiting from broad use as an acute therapy, Nurtec ODT is currently being prescribed as an earlier-line preventive therapy compared to Emgality. The majority of patients prescribed Nurtec ODT had failed at most one prior therapy, whereas more than half of patients were prescribed Emgality after two or more prior preventive therapy failures. Among those who discontinued a therapy, topiramate and/or an antidepressant were the most likely prior therapies for both brands.

與Emgality相比,Nurtec ODT可能受益於作為一種急性療法的廣泛使用,目前正作為一種更早的預防性療法被開出處方。大多數患者服用Nurtec ODT之前最多隻有一次治療失敗,而超過一半的患者在之前兩次或兩次以上的預防性治療失敗後開了Emgality。在那些停止治療的人中,託吡酯和/或抗抑鬱藥是這兩個品牌最有可能的先前治療。

While contributing physicians were substantially more likely to agree that the responder rates of the CGRP monoclonal antibodies (i.e., Emgality) versus that of Nurtec ODT are superior to topiramate or Botox, efficacy expectations were key to decisions to prescribe the gepant.

雖然有貢獻的醫生更有可能同意CGRP單克隆抗體(即Emgality)相對於Nurtec ODT的應答率優於託吡酯或肉毒桿菌,但療效預期是決定開Gepant的關鍵。

Nurtec ODT was most commonly prescribed due to a desire for sustained efficacy, speed of efficacy onset, and ≥50% responder rate. Although Nurtec ODT represents the first oral CGRP antagonist, attributes related to its dosing profile did not break the top five most common reasons for prescribing. In comparison, favorable tolerability profile and preferred autoinjector were among the most common reasons for deciding to prescribe Emgality.

最常用的處方是Nurtec ODT,因為希望獲得持久的療效、起效速度和≥50%的應答率。儘管Nurtec ODT代表了第一種口服降鈣素基因相關肽拮抗劑,但與其劑量分佈相關的屬性並沒有打破最常見的5個處方原因。相比之下,良好的耐受性和首選的自動注射器是決定使用Emgality的最常見原因。

Suggesting strong competitive pressure within the prevention segment, Emgality lost more than half of the brand's possible new prescription opportunities to other brands. In comparison, Nurtec ODT tends to emerge successful when up against a likely alternative option during the therapy selection process. When competing directly with Emgality, preferred dosing formulation and better convenience were central to Nurtec ODT winning the new prescription opportunity.

這表明預防領域存在強大的競爭壓力,Emgality將該品牌可能的新處方藥機會的一半以上拱手讓給了其他品牌。相比之下,當在治療選擇過程中遇到可能的替代選擇時,Nurtec ODT往往會成功。當與Emgality直接競爭時,首選的劑量配方和更好的便利性是Nurtec ODT贏得新處方機會的關鍵。

However, in the end, it is Aimovig and Botox (and not Emgality) that appear to be Nurtec ODT's toughest competitors, with monthly migraine day reduction expectations and patient requests driving those brands' respective wins over the new kid on the block. With Nurtec ODT approved for episodic migraine and Botox for chronic migraine, it's expected that AbbVie's focus is on atogepant – the potentially second-to-segment gepant assuming a positive PDUFA later this month for the preventive treatment of migraine.

然而,歸根結底,似乎是Aimovig和Botox(而不是Emgality)是Nurtec ODT最難對付的競爭對手,每月偏頭痛天數的減少預期和耐心的要求推動着這兩個品牌分別贏得了新上市的孩子的青睞。隨着Nurtec ODT被批准用於發作性偏頭痛,肉毒桿菌毒素被批准用於慢性偏頭痛,預計AbbVie的重點將放在非感受劑上-這種潛在的次要節段的止痛藥假設PDUFA在本月晚些時候呈陽性,用於偏頭痛的預防性治療。

While Aimovig and Emgality antagonize CGRP through different mechanisms, positive outcomes from Eli Lilly's planned head-to-head trial demonstrating efficacy superiority to Nurtec ODT could help Amgen buffer future competition from Nurtec ODT and atogepant.

雖然Aimovig和Emgality通過不同的機制對抗CGRP,但禮來公司計劃中的面對面試驗的積極結果表明療效優於Nurtec ODT,這可能有助於安進緩衝來自Nurtec ODT和無感受者的未來競爭。

About RealWorld Dynamix™
RealWorld Dynamix™ is an independent, data-driven service unveiling real patient management patterns through rigorous analysis of large-scale patient chart audits. Insights reveal the "why" behind treatment decisions, include year over year trending to quantify key aspects of market evolution, and integrate specialists' attitudinal & demographic data to highlight differences between stated and actual treatment patterns.

關於RealWorld Dynamix™
RealWorld Dynamix™是一項獨立的、數據驅動的服務,通過對大規模病歷審計的嚴格分析來揭示真實的患者管理模式。洞察力揭示了治療決策背後的“原因”,包括量化市場演變的關鍵方面的逐年趨勢,以及整合專家的態度和人口統計數據,以突出陳述的治療模式和實際治療模式之間的差異。

The 2021 audit is the third annual edition included in the RealWorld Dynamix™: Preventive Treatment in Migraine (US) service. Learn more about our services here.

2021年的審計是包括在2021年審計中的第三個年度版本Realworld Dynamix™:偏頭痛的預防性治療(美國)服務。單擊此處瞭解有關我們服務的更多信息。

About Spherix Global Insights
Spherix Global Insights is a hyper-focused market intelligence firm that leverages our own independent data and expertise to provide strategic guidance, so biopharma stakeholders make decisions with confidence. We specialize in select dermatology, gastroenterology, nephrology, neurology, and rheumatology markets.

關於Spherix Global Insight
Spherix Global Insights是一家高度專注的市場情報公司,利用我們自己的獨立數據和專業知識提供戰略指導,讓生物製藥利益相關者充滿信心地做出決策。我們專門從事皮膚科、腸胃科、腎臟科、神經科和風濕科的精選市場。

All company, brand or product names in this document are trademarks of their respective holders.

本文檔中的所有公司、品牌或產品名稱均為其各自所有者的商標。

For more information contact:
Kristen Henn, Business Development Manager
Email: [email protected]
www.spherixglobalinsights.com

如需更多信息,請聯繫:業務發展經理克里斯汀·亨恩(Kristen Henn)電子郵件:[受電子郵件保護]Www.spherixglobalinsights.com

SOURCE Spherix Global Insights

Source Spherix Global Insight

Related Links

相關鏈接

http://www.spherixglobalinsights.com

Http://www.spherixglobalinsights.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論