share_log

Barron's: Which company can reach $1 trillion after Facebook? Here's our opinion.

Barron's: Which company can reach $1 trillion after Facebook? Here's our opinion.

Barron‘s:繼Facebook之後,哪家公司的市值能達到1萬億美元?以下是我們的看法。
Dow Jones Newswires ·  2021/07/10 03:19

By Alex Eule

亞歷克斯·尤爾著

Late last month, Facebook notched what could be its most notable achievement yet: Its market value hit $1 trillion. Just five U.S.-listed companies have reached the $1 trillion mark -- or 0.08% of the total number of stocks currently traded on the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq. That's roughly the odds of a high school basketball player making the National Basketball Association. It's an elite club.

上月底,Facebook取得了可能是其迄今最引人注目的成就:其市值達到了1萬億美元。市值突破1萬億美元大關的美國上市公司只有五家,佔紐約證交所和納斯達克目前交易股票總數的0.08%。這大致相當於一名高中籃球運動員進入美國國家籃球協會的機率。這是一家精英俱樂部。

Now that $Facebook Inc(FB.US)$ has earned access -- its market cap was down slightly by the end of the week, to $980 billion -- we might be waiting a while for the next entrant. That's partly because the federal government wants to rein in big business, but also because the current trillion-dollar members have a natural incentive to keep the club small.

現在$Facebook(FB.US)$到本週末,它的市值略有下降,降至9800億美元,我們可能還需要等待一段時間才能看到下一位競爭者。這在一定程度上是因為聯邦政府想要控制大企業,但也是因為目前數萬億美元的成員有一種天然的動機來保持俱樂部的規模。

There's a big drop-off to the next candidate for membership -- call it the Trillion-Dollar Cliff. Among U.S.-listed companies, $Tesla, Inc.(TSLA.US)$ is next up, with a market value of $629 billion, followed by $Berkshire Hathaway Inc.-Class A(BRK.A.US)$, $Alibaba Group Holding Ltd(BABA.US)$, $Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd(TSM.US)$ and $Visa Inc(V.US)$.

下一個成員資格候選人的支持率大幅下降--稱之為萬億美元懸崖。在美國上市公司中,$Tesla,Inc.(TSLA.US)$緊隨其後,市值為6290億美元,緊隨其後的是$Berkshire Hathaway Inc.-A類(BRK.A.US)$, $阿里巴巴(BABA.US)$, $臺積電(TSM.US)$$Visa(V.US)$.

We've covered all of those stocks closely at Barron's, and I've spent the past few weeks talking to colleagues about which company might be next. I've also queried sources and polled readers of our daily Review & Preview newsletter.

我們已經在Barron‘s密切關注了所有這些股票,過去幾周我一直在與同事們討論下一家可能是哪家公司。我還詢問了我們每日評論與預覽時事通訊的來源和讀者。

A few names get repeated mentions: Tesla, $NVIDIA Corp(NVDA.US)$, Visa, and $JPMorgan Chase & Co(JPM.US)$, each of which are worth at least $400 billion. Shopify (SHOP) got a less obvious mention. The company is way down the market-value rank at $182 billion. It has become something of the anti- Amazon, providing bricks-and-mortar vendors and other businesses with easy e-commerce tools. While Amazon.com seeks to fend off regulation and a potential breakup, Shopify can keep its head down and continue to recruit new business.

有幾個名字被反覆提及:特斯拉,$英偉達(美國內華達州)$、Visa和$摩根大通(摩根大通美國)$,每一家都至少價值4000億美元。Shopify(商店)得到了一個不那麼明顯的提及。該公司市值僅為1,820億美元,遠遠低於這一水平。它已經成為了某種程度上的反亞馬遜者,為實體供應商和其他企業提供了簡單的電子商務工具。雖然亞馬遜尋求抵禦監管和潛在的拆分,但Shopify可以保持低調,繼續招募新業務。

I'll place my bets on Visa getting to $1 trillion next, even if it takes a while. The company is closely tied to the economic recovery, since it gets a cut of transactions that run through its global electronic-payments network.

我把賭注押在Visa接下來會達到1萬億美元,即使這需要一段時間。該公司與經濟復甦密切相關,因為它從通過其全球電子支付網絡進行的交易中分得一杯羹。

The business, which is part tech and part financial services, has a long tailwind as cash usage declines around the world. Visa shares have returned an annualized 28% over the past decade. If that pattern holds, Visa would reach $1 trillion by 2024.

這項業務部分是科技,部分是金融服務,隨着世界各地現金使用量的下降,這項業務有很長的順風。過去十年,Visa股票的年化回報率為28%。如果這種模式保持不變,到2024年,Visa的收入將達到1萬億美元。

While the next trillion-dollar stock is clearly a guessing game, one thing is clear: Large numbers have been no impediment to future gains. Apple has returned an annualized 44% since it became the first U.S.-listed company to reach a $1 trillion value in August 2018. The stock closed at a record this past week, giving it a market value of $2.4 trillion.

雖然下一個萬億美元的股票顯然是一場猜謎遊戲,但有一件事是明確的:大量的股票並不會阻礙未來的收益。自2018年8月成為首家市值達到1萬億美元的美國上市公司以來,蘋果的年化回報率為44%。過去一週,該股收盤創下歷史新高,市值達到2.4萬億美元。

I asked Denise Chisholm, Fidelity's sector strategist, if the so-called law of large numbers would ever kick in. "Size is not particularly predictive one way or the other," she says. "The S&P information technology, as a percent of overall S&P, is now in excess of 20%. Does that have any meaning on whether or not that group or that sector can outperform in the future? The answer really is no."

我問富達的行業策略師丹尼斯·奇澤姆(Denise Chisholm),所謂的大數定律是否會生效。她説:“無論從哪方面來説,規模都不能很好地預測。”“標普信息技術指數目前佔整體標普指數的比例超過20%。這對該集團或該行業未來能否跑贏大盤有任何意義嗎?答案真的是否定的。”

Right now, the trillion-dollar members have momentum on their side. "A ball in motion tends to stay in motion," she says.

現在,萬億美元的成員有勢頭站在他們這邊。“運動中的球往往會保持運動狀態,”她説。

Tech's secret sauce has been continuously expanding profit margins, with valuations that are essentially in line with their historic norms. Operating margins for the S&P 500's information technology sector have doubled in the past 15 years, to a recent 21%, according to Yardeni Research, while overall S&P 500 margins have been static at 10% or so (excluding a collapse during the financial crisis).

科技公司的祕訣一直是不斷擴大利潤率,估值基本上符合它們的歷史正常水平。根據Yardeni Research的數據,過去15年,標準普爾500指數信息技術板塊的營業利潤率翻了一番,最近達到21%,而整體標準普爾500指數的利潤率一直穩定在10%左右(不包括金融危機期間的崩盤)。

Tech's magic -- and those trillion-dollar club passes -- are now hitting up against the increased likelihood of regulation. "The sheer fact of the headline of the trillion-dollar club is going to bring even more regulation," says Jim Paulsen, chief investment officer of The Leuthold Group.

科技的魔力--以及那些價值數萬億美元的俱樂部通行證--現在正面臨着監管可能性的增加。Leuthold Group首席投資官吉姆·保爾森(Jim Paulsen)表示:“這個萬億美元俱樂部的頭條新聞將帶來更多監管。”

On Friday, the Biden administration signed an executive order that calls for a "whole-of-government effort to promote competition in the American economy." The order, which consists of 72 initiatives, is simultaneously broad and narrow. It pushes against consolidation while also addressing consumer pain points, like early-termination fees for broadband services, hard-to-fix consumer devices, and airline baggage fees.

週五,拜登政府簽署了一項行政命令,呼籲“全政府努力促進美國經濟中的競爭”。這個由72項倡議組成的秩序既寬泛又狹隘。它反對整合,同時也解決了消費者的痛點,如寬帶服務的提前終止費、難以修復的消費設備和航空公司的行李費。

By now, the Biden administration recognizes that tech regulation isn't a slam dunk with the public. Despite unease around data and privacy practices, less than half of U.S. adults are in favor of more tech regulation, according to a 2020 Pew Research poll.

到目前為止,拜登政府認識到,科技監管並不是公眾的一記重擊。皮尤研究中心(Pew Research)2020年的一項民意調查顯示,儘管人們對數據和隱私做法感到不安,但只有不到一半的美國成年人支持更多的科技監管。

Privacy regulation is politically complicated, especially if it means reining in the advertising that enables free services like social media, internet search, and email. But there isn't much controversial about limiting broadband charges or making it easier to fix a smartphone battery. The White House seems to be attacking companies where it hurts -- their mixed record of customer service.

隱私監管在政治上是複雜的,特別是如果它意味着控制廣告,這些廣告可以提供社交媒體、互聯網搜索和電子郵件等免費服務。但限制寬帶收費或讓智能手機電池更容易修復並沒有太多爭議。白宮似乎正在攻擊公司的痛處--它們的客户服務記錄參差不齊。

For now, investors continue to generally overlook regulation. All five members of the trillion-dollar club were either higher or flat on Friday in the wake of Biden's executive order.

就目前而言,投資者仍然普遍忽視監管。在拜登的行政命令發佈後,這個萬億美元俱樂部的五名成員在週五要麼上漲,要麼持平。

It's time to take regulation more seriously, says Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research. "A trillion here, a trillion there attracts a lot of attention from politicians."

Yardeni Research總裁埃德·亞德尼表示,是時候更認真地對待監管了。“這裏一萬億,那裏一萬億,引起了政界人士的極大關注。”

Write to Alex Eule at alex.eule@barrons.com

寫信給Alex Eule,電子郵件:alex.eule@Barrons.com

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

(完)道瓊通訊社

July 09, 2021 20:06 ET (00:06 GMT)

2021年07月09日20:06東部時間(格林尼治標準時間00:06)

Copyright (c) 2021 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

版權所有(C)2021道瓊斯公司。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論