share_log

With 82% Ownership in Independent Bank Corp. (NASDAQ:INDB), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

With 82% Ownership in Independent Bank Corp. (NASDAQ:INDB), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

擁有獨立銀行公司(納斯達克股票代碼:INDB)82%的所有權,機構投資者在很大程度上依賴該業務
Simply Wall St ·  05/23 12:44

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Independent Bank's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 高機構所有權意味着獨立銀行的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 共有10名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%
  • 業內人士最近一直在拋售

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Independent Bank Corp. (NASDAQ:INDB), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 82% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解誰真正控制了獨立銀行公司(納斯達克股票代碼:INDB),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。機構擁有82%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

Last week's 3.6% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 21%.

上週3.6%的漲幅意味着,儘管該公司表現出強勁的長期趨勢,但機構投資者仍處於積極的一端。上週的漲勢將進一步提振目前爲21%的股東一年回報率。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Independent Bank.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於獨立銀行的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:INDB Ownership Breakdown May 23rd 2024
納斯達克GS:INDB所有權明細 2024年5月23日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Independent Bank?

關於獨立銀行,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

Independent Bank already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Independent Bank's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

獨立銀行已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到獨立銀行的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:INDB Earnings and Revenue Growth May 23rd 2024
納斯達克GS:INDB收益和收入增長 2024年5月23日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Independent Bank is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 15% of shares outstanding. With 12% and 5.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。獨立銀行不歸對沖基金所有。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是貝萊德公司,其已發行股份的15%。Vanguard Group, Inc.和State Street Global Advisors, Inc.分別擁有12%和5.4%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。

We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前十名股東佔股票登記冊的一半以上,少數規模較小的股東可以在一定程度上平衡大股東的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Independent Bank

獨立銀行的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Independent Bank Corp. in their own names. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own US$20m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的數據表明,內部人士以自己的名義擁有獨立銀行公司不到1%的股份。這是一家大公司,因此即使是很小的比例權益也可以在董事會和股東之間建立一致。在本案中,內部人士擁有價值2000萬美元的股票。很高興看到董事會成員擁有股票,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 17% stake in Independent Bank. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有獨立銀行17%的股份。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Independent Bank has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。以風險爲例——獨立銀行有1個警告信號,我們認爲你應該注意。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論