share_log

Algoma Steel Group Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ASTL) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 6.4% Over the Past Week

Algoma Steel Group Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ASTL) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 6.4% Over the Past Week

Algoma Steel Group Inc. 's(納斯達克股票代碼:ASTL)隨着股票繼續給人留下深刻印象,過去一週上漲6.4%,大型機構所有者必須感到高興
Simply Wall St ·  05/22 14:24

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Algoma Steel Group implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 14 shareholders
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • 機構對Algoma Steel Group的大量持股意味着它們對該公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 51% 的業務由前 14 名股東持有
  • 內部人士最近買了

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Algoma Steel Group Inc. (NASDAQ:ASTL), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 57% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制了Algoma Steel Group Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:ASTL),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲57%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Last week's 6.4% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The one-year return on investment is currently 13% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

上週6.4%的漲幅意味着,儘管該公司表現出強勁的長期趨勢,但機構投資者仍處於積極的一端。目前,一年的投資回報率爲13%,上週的收益本來會非常受歡迎。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Algoma Steel Group, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Algoma Steel Group的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGM:ASTL Ownership Breakdown May 22nd 2024
NasdaqGM:ASTL 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 22 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Algoma Steel Group?

關於Algoma Steel Group,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Algoma Steel Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Algoma Steel Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,Algoma Steel Group確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Algoma鋼鐵集團的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGM:ASTL Earnings and Revenue Growth May 22nd 2024
納斯達克通用汽車公司:ASTL 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 22 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Our data indicates that hedge funds own 13% of Algoma Steel Group. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. The company's largest shareholder is Donald Smith & Co., Inc., with ownership of 9.4%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.5% and 5.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。我們的數據顯示,對沖基金擁有Algoma鋼鐵集團13%的股份。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可以非常活躍和活躍。許多人正在尋找推動股價上漲的中期催化劑。該公司的最大股東是唐納德·史密斯公司,所有權爲9.4%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的7.5%和5.9%。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 14 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

從股東登記冊來看,我們可以看到51%的所有權由前14名股東控制,這意味着沒有一個股東擁有所有權的多數股東。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Algoma Steel Group

Algoma Steel Group 的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Algoma Steel Group Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$856m, and insiders have US$24m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

股東們可能會有興趣得知內部人士擁有Algoma Steel Group Inc.的股份。它的市值僅爲8.56億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值2400萬美元的股票。這至少顯示出一定的對齊性。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 27% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Algoma Steel Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Algoma Steel Group擁有27%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對Algoma Steel Group有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Algoma Steel Group that you should be aware of before investing here.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,我們發現了Algoma Steel Group的3個警告信號,在投資之前,您應該注意這些信號。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論