share_log

Liberty Broadband (NASDAQ:LBRD.K) Investors Are Sitting on a Loss of 67% If They Invested Three Years Ago

Liberty Broadband (NASDAQ:LBRD.K) Investors Are Sitting on a Loss of 67% If They Invested Three Years Ago

自由寬帶(納斯達克股票代碼:LBRD.K)投資者如果在三年前進行投資,將蒙受67%的損失
Simply Wall St ·  05/13 06:03

Investing in stocks inevitably means buying into some companies that perform poorly.  But the long term shareholders of Liberty Broadband Corporation (NASDAQ:LBRD.K) have had an unfortunate run in the last three years.  Sadly for them, the share price is down 67% in that time.    And the ride hasn't got any smoother in recent times over the last year, with the price 32% lower in that time.     Shareholders have had an even rougher run lately, with the share price down 12% in the last 90 days.    We note that the company has reported results fairly recently; and the market is hardly delighted. You can check out the latest numbers in our company report.

投資股票不可避免地意味着買入一些表現不佳的公司。但是,在過去三年中,自由寬帶公司(納斯達克股票代碼:LBRD.K)的長期股東表現不佳。對他們來說,可悲的是,當時股價下跌了67%。而且在過去的一年裏,這種行程並沒有變得更加順利,同期價格下降了32%。股東們最近的表現更加艱難,股價在過去90天中下跌了12%。我們注意到,該公司最近公佈了業績;市場對此並不滿意。您可以在我們的公司報告中查看最新的數字。

Since shareholders are down over the longer term, lets look at the underlying fundamentals over the that time and see if they've been consistent with returns.  

由於股東長期處於低迷狀態,讓我們來看看那段時間的基本面,看看它們與回報是否一致。

To paraphrase Benjamin Graham: Over the short term the market is a voting machine, but over the long term it's a weighing machine.  By comparing earnings per share (EPS) and share price changes over time, we can get a feel for how investor attitudes to a company have morphed over time.

用本傑明·格雷厄姆的話來說:從短期來看,市場是一臺投票機,但從長遠來看,它是一臺稱重機。通過比較每股收益(EPS)和股價隨時間推移的變化,我們可以了解投資者對公司的態度如何隨着時間的推移而變化。

Although the share price is down over three years, Liberty Broadband actually managed to grow EPS by 35% per year in that time.  Given the share price reaction, one might suspect that EPS is not a good guide to the business performance during the period (perhaps due to a one-off loss or gain).  Or else the company was over-hyped in the past, and so its growth has disappointed.

儘管股價在三年內下跌,但在此期間,Liberty Broadband實際上每年設法將每股收益增長35%。鑑於股價的反應,人們可能會懷疑每股收益並不能很好地指導該期間的業務表現(可能是由於一次性的虧損或收益)。否則,該公司過去曾被過度炒作,因此其增長令人失望。

It's worth taking a look at other metrics, because the EPS growth doesn't seem to match with the falling share price.

值得一看其他指標,因爲每股收益的增長似乎與股價的下跌不符。

Revenue is actually up 18% over the three years, so the share price drop doesn't seem to hinge on revenue, either.  This analysis is just perfunctory, but it might be worth researching Liberty Broadband more closely, as sometimes stocks fall unfairly. This could present an opportunity.    

在過去的三年中,收入實際上增長了18%,因此股價下跌似乎也不取決於收入。這種分析只是敷衍了事,但可能值得對Liberty Broadband進行更仔細的研究,因爲有時股票會不公平地下跌。這可能帶來機會。

The company's revenue and earnings (over time) are depicted in the image below (click to see the exact numbers).

公司的收入和收益(隨着時間的推移)如下圖所示(點擊查看確切數字)。

NasdaqGS:LBRD.K Earnings and Revenue Growth May 13th 2024

NASDAQGS: LBRD.K 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 13 日

It is of course excellent to see how Liberty Broadband has grown profits over the years, but the future is more important for shareholders.  Take a more thorough look at Liberty Broadband's financial health with this free report on its balance sheet.

看到Liberty Broadband多年來如何增加利潤當然是件好事,但未來對股東來說更爲重要。通過這份免費的資產負債表報告,更全面地了解Liberty Broadband的財務狀況。

A Different Perspective

不同的視角

Liberty Broadband shareholders are down 32% for the year, but the market itself is up 28%.  However, keep in mind that even the best stocks will sometimes underperform the market over a twelve month period.     Regrettably, last year's performance caps off a bad run, with the shareholders facing a total loss of 8% per year over five years.  We realise that Baron Rothschild has said investors should "buy when there is blood on the streets", but we caution that investors should first be sure they are buying a high quality business.        While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important.   Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk.   We've identified 3 warning signs with Liberty Broadband (at least 2 which shouldn't be ignored)  , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.  

自由寬帶股東今年下跌了32%,但市場本身上漲了28%。但是,請記住,即使是最好的股票有時也會在十二個月內表現不如市場。遺憾的是,去年的業績結束了糟糕的表現,股東在五年內每年面臨8%的總虧損。我們意識到羅斯柴爾德男爵曾說過,投資者應該 “在街頭流血時買入”,但我們警告說,投資者應首先確保他們購買的是高質量的企業。儘管市場狀況可能對股價產生的不同影響值得考慮,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經確定了Liberty Broadband的3個警告信號(至少有2個不容忽視),了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

But note: Liberty Broadband may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with past earnings growth (and further growth forecast).

但請注意:自由寬帶可能不是最值得購買的股票。因此,來看看這份過去盈利增長(以及進一步增長預測)的有趣公司的免費清單。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

請注意,本文引用的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所交易的股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論