share_log

We Think Exponent's (NASDAQ:EXPO) Healthy Earnings Might Be Conservative

We Think Exponent's (NASDAQ:EXPO) Healthy Earnings Might Be Conservative

我們認爲Exponent(納斯達克股票代碼:EXPO)的健康收益可能是保守的
Simply Wall St ·  05/11 08:10

Shareholders appeared to be happy with Exponent, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:EXPO) solid earnings report last week. According to our analysis of the report, the strong headline profit numbers are supported by strong earnings fundamentals.

股東們似乎對Exponent, Inc.感到滿意。”s(納斯達克股票代碼:EXPO)上週的收益報告穩健。根據我們對報告的分析,強勁的總體利潤數字得到了強勁的收益基本面的支持。

earnings-and-revenue-history
NasdaqGS:EXPO Earnings and Revenue History May 11th 2024
納斯達克GS: 世博會收益和收入歷史記錄 2024 年 5 月 11 日

Zooming In On Exponent's Earnings

放大 Exponent 的收益

One key financial ratio used to measure how well a company converts its profit to free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio. In plain english, this ratio subtracts FCF from net profit, and divides that number by the company's average operating assets over that period. The ratio shows us how much a company's profit exceeds its FCF.

用於衡量公司將其利潤轉換爲自由現金流(FCF)的情況的一個關鍵財務比率是應計比率。簡而言之,該比率從淨利潤中減去FCF,然後將該數字除以該時期公司的平均運營資產。該比率向我們顯示了公司的利潤超過其FCF的程度。

As a result, a negative accrual ratio is a positive for the company, and a positive accrual ratio is a negative. While having an accrual ratio above zero is of little concern, we do think it's worth noting when a company has a relatively high accrual ratio. That's because some academic studies have suggested that high accruals ratios tend to lead to lower profit or less profit growth.

因此,負應計比率對公司來說是正數,而正應計比率是負數。雖然應計比率高於零並不令人擔憂,但我們確實認爲,當公司的應計比率相對較高時,值得注意。這是因爲一些學術研究表明,高應計率往往會導致利潤下降或利潤增長減弱。

Over the twelve months to March 2024, Exponent recorded an accrual ratio of -0.15. Therefore, its statutory earnings were very significantly less than its free cashflow. In fact, it had free cash flow of US$132m in the last year, which was a lot more than its statutory profit of US$101.4m. Exponent shareholders are no doubt pleased that free cash flow improved over the last twelve months.

在截至2024年3月的十二個月中,Exponent的應計比率爲-0.15。因此,其法定收入大大低於其自由現金流。實際上,它去年的自由現金流爲1.32億美元,遠遠超過其1.014億美元的法定利潤。毫無疑問,指數股東對過去十二個月自由現金流的改善感到高興。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

這可能會讓你想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以單擊此處查看根據他們的估計描繪未來盈利能力的交互式圖表。

Our Take On Exponent's Profit Performance

我們對Exponent盈利表現的看法

As we discussed above, Exponent has perfectly satisfactory free cash flow relative to profit. Because of this, we think Exponent's earnings potential is at least as good as it seems, and maybe even better! And the EPS is up 19% annually, over the last three years. The goal of this article has been to assess how well we can rely on the statutory earnings to reflect the company's potential, but there is plenty more to consider. If you'd like to know more about Exponent as a business, it's important to be aware of any risks it's facing. While conducting our analysis, we found that Exponent has 1 warning sign and it would be unwise to ignore it.

正如我們上面討論的那樣,Exponent的自由現金流相對於利潤來說非常令人滿意。因此,我們認爲Exponent的盈利潛力至少和看起來一樣好,甚至可能更好!在過去三年中,每股收益每年增長19%。本文的目標是評估我們在多大程度上可以依靠法定收益來反映公司的潛力,但還有很多需要考慮的地方。如果您想進一步了解Exponent作爲一家企業,請務必了解其面臨的任何風險。在進行分析時,我們發現 Exponent 有 1 個警告信號,因此忽略它是不明智的。

This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of Exponent's profit. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks that insiders are buying.

本報告僅研究了揭示Exponent利潤性質的單一因素。但是,還有很多其他方法可以讓你對公司的看法。例如,許多人認爲高股本回報率是有利的商業經濟的標誌,而另一些人則喜歡 “關注資金”,尋找內部人士正在買入的股票。因此,你可能希望看到這份免費收藏的擁有高股本回報率的公司,或者這份內部人士正在購買的股票清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論