share_log

Kinetic Development Group Limited (HKG:1277) Adds HK$674m in Market Cap and Insiders Have a 74% Stake in That Gain

Kinetic Development Group Limited (HKG:1277) Adds HK$674m in Market Cap and Insiders Have a 74% Stake in That Gain

Kinetic Development Group Limited(HKG: 1277)增加了6.74億港元的市值,內部人士在該收益中持有74%的股份
Simply Wall St ·  05/10 19:23

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant insider control over Kinetic Development Group implies vested interests in company growth
  • 63% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Liang Zhang)
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 對Kinetic Development Group的重大內部控制意味着公司增長中的既得利益
  • 公司63%的股份由單一股東(張亮)持有
  • 所有權研究與過去的表現數據相結合,可以幫助人們更好地了解股票的機會

If you want to know who really controls Kinetic Development Group Limited (HKG:1277), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 74% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了Kinetic Development Group Limited(HKG: 1277),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。個人內部人士持有74%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 8.7% gain.

結果,內部人士是上週8.7%漲幅的最大受益者。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Kinetic Development Group, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Kinetic開發集團的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:1277 Ownership Breakdown May 10th 2024
SEHK: 1277 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 10 日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Kinetic Development Group?

關於Kinetic Development Group,缺乏機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.

交易不太活躍的小公司通常缺少機構投資者,但是沒有機構投資者的大公司並不常見。

There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Kinetic Development Group might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.

公司在股票登記處可能沒有任何機構的原因有很多。如果流動性(每天交易的股票數量)低,機構可能很難購買大量股票。如果公司不需要籌集資金,機構可能缺乏建立立場的機會。另一方面,專業投資者總是有可能避開一家公司,因爲他們認爲這不是賺錢的最佳去處。Kinetic Development Group可能沒有機構想要的那種過去的業績,或者他們可能根本沒有仔細研究該業務。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:1277 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 10th 2024
SEHK: 1277 2024年5月10日收益和收入增長

Kinetic Development Group is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Liang Zhang, with ownership of 63%. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. Li Zhang is the second largest shareholder owning 11% of common stock, and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP holds about 0.2% of the company stock.

Kinetic Development Group不歸對沖基金所有。該公司的最大股東是張亮,所有權爲63%。這意味着他們對公司的未來擁有多數權益控制權。張麗是第二大股東,擁有11%的普通股,Dimensional Fund Advisors LP持有該公司約0.2%的股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。據我們所知,沒有分析師對該公司進行報道,因此它可能處於雷達之下。

Insider Ownership Of Kinetic Development Group

Kinetic 開發集團的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Kinetic Development Group Limited stock. This gives them a lot of power. That means insiders have a very meaningful HK$6.3b stake in this HK$8.4b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been selling any of their shares.

內部人士似乎擁有Kinetic Development Group Limited一半以上的股票。這賦予了他們很大的力量。這意味着內部人士在這項84億港元的業務中擁有非常可觀的63億港元股份。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士是否在出售他們的任何股票。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 25% stake in Kinetic Development Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Kinetic Development Group25%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Kinetic Development Group .

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,你應該注意我們在Kinetic Development Group發現的1個警告信號。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

當然,通過尋找其他地方,你可能會找到一筆不錯的投資。因此,來看看這份有趣的公司的免費清單吧。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論