share_log

United Parcel Service's (NYSE:UPS) Conservative Accounting Might Explain Soft Earnings

United Parcel Service's (NYSE:UPS) Conservative Accounting Might Explain Soft Earnings

聯合包裹服務公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:UPS)的保守會計可能會解釋軟收益
Simply Wall St ·  05/10 07:12

Shareholders appeared unconcerned with United Parcel Service, Inc.'s (NYSE:UPS) lackluster earnings report last week. We did some digging, and we believe the earnings are stronger than they seem.

股東們似乎對聯合包裹服務公司漠不關心。”s(紐約證券交易所代碼:UPS)上週的收益報告乏善可陳。我們進行了一些挖掘,我們認爲收益比看起來要強勁。

earnings-and-revenue-history
NYSE:UPS Earnings and Revenue History May 10th 2024
紐約證券交易所:UPS 收益和收入歷史記錄 2024 年 5 月 10 日

How Do Unusual Items Influence Profit?

不尋常的物品如何影響利潤?

For anyone who wants to understand United Parcel Service's profit beyond the statutory numbers, it's important to note that during the last twelve months statutory profit was reduced by US$1.2b due to unusual items. It's never great to see unusual items costing the company profits, but on the upside, things might improve sooner rather than later. We looked at thousands of listed companies and found that unusual items are very often one-off in nature. And that's hardly a surprise given these line items are considered unusual. If United Parcel Service doesn't see those unusual expenses repeat, then all else being equal we'd expect its profit to increase over the coming year.

對於任何想了解聯合包裹服務超出法定數字的利潤的人來說,值得注意的是,在過去的十二個月中,由於不尋常的物品,法定利潤減少了12億美元。看到不尋常的項目使公司利潤損失從來都不是一件好事,但從好的方面來看,情況可能遲早會好轉。我們調查了數千家上市公司,發現不尋常的物品本質上往往是一次性的。鑑於這些單列項目被認爲不尋常,這並不奇怪。如果聯合包裹服務沒有看到這些不尋常的支出重演,那麼在其他條件相同的情況下,我們預計其利潤將在來年增加。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

這可能會讓你想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以單擊此處查看根據他們的估計描繪未來盈利能力的交互式圖表。

Our Take On United Parcel Service's Profit Performance

我們對聯合包裹服務盈利表現的看法

Because unusual items detracted from United Parcel Service's earnings over the last year, you could argue that we can expect an improved result in the current quarter. Based on this observation, we consider it likely that United Parcel Service's statutory profit actually understates its earnings potential! And the EPS is up 16% annually, over the last three years. Of course, we've only just scratched the surface when it comes to analysing its earnings; one could also consider margins, forecast growth, and return on investment, among other factors. Keep in mind, when it comes to analysing a stock it's worth noting the risks involved. When we did our research, we found 3 warning signs for United Parcel Service (1 is a bit concerning!) that we believe deserve your full attention.

由於不尋常的物品影響了聯合包裹服務公司去年的收益,你可能會爭辯說,我們可以預期本季度的業績會有所改善。基於這一觀察,我們認爲聯合包裹服務的法定利潤實際上可能低估了其盈利潛力!在過去三年中,每股收益每年增長16%。當然,我們只是在分析其收益時才浮出水面;人們還可以考慮利潤率、預測增長和投資回報率等因素。請記住,在分析股票時,值得注意所涉及的風險。當我們進行研究時,我們發現了聯合包裹服務的 3 個警告標誌(1 個有點令人擔憂!)我們認爲值得你全神貫注。

Today we've zoomed in on a single data point to better understand the nature of United Parcel Service's profit. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks that insiders are buying to be useful.

今天,我們放大了單一數據點,以更好地了解聯合包裹服務利潤的性質。但是,還有很多其他方法可以讓你對公司的看法。例如,許多人認爲高股本回報率是有利的商業經濟的標誌,而另一些人則喜歡 “關注資金”,尋找內部人士正在買入的股票。雖然可能需要你進行一些研究,但你可能會發現這份免費收集的擁有高股本回報率的公司,或者這份內部人士正在購買的股票清單很有用。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論