share_log

With 83% Ownership, UFP Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ:UFPI) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 83% Ownership, UFP Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ:UFPI) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

UFP Industries, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:UFPI)擁有 83% 的所有權,擁有強大的機構支持
Simply Wall St ·  05/03 15:38

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies UFP Industries' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 11 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 高機構所有權意味着UFP Industries的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 前11名股東擁有公司51%的股份
  • 業內人士最近一直在拋售

If you want to know who really controls UFP Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ:UFPI), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 83% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了UFP Industries, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:UFPI),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲83%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

鑑於其可支配的資金和研究能力巨大,機構所有權往往具有很大的份量,對於個人投資者而言尤其如此。因此,向公司投資的大量機構資金通常被視爲積極屬性。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of UFP Industries.

在下圖中,我們放大了UFP Industries的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:UFPI Ownership Breakdown May 3rd 2024
納斯達克GS:UFPI 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 3 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About UFP Industries?

關於UFP Industries,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in UFP Industries. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of UFP Industries, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如你所見,機構投資者在UFP Industries中擁有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看UFP Industries過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:UFPI Earnings and Revenue Growth May 3rd 2024
納斯達克GS:UFPI 收益和收入增長 2024 年 5 月 3 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. UFP Industries is not owned by hedge funds. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 14% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 11% and 5.1% of the stock. Furthermore, CEO Matthew Missad is the owner of 0.6% of the company's shares.

由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。UFP Industries不歸對沖基金所有。貝萊德公司目前是最大股東,已發行股份的14%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約11%和5.1%的股份。此外,首席執行官馬修·米薩德持有該公司0.6%的股份。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 11 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

從股東登記處來看,我們可以看到51%的所有權由前11名股東控制,這意味着沒有一個股東在所有權中擁有多數股權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of UFP Industries

UFP Industries的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

We can report that insiders do own shares in UFP Industries, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$161m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有UFP Industries, Inc.的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些潛在的有意義的調整通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約1.61億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。如果您想探討內幕調整問題,可以點擊此處查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 14% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司14%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這個團體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand UFP Industries better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with UFP Industries .

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解UFP Industries,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,你應該注意我們在UFP Industries身上發現的1個警告信號。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論