share_log

C3.ai, Inc.'s (NYSE:AI) Market Cap Touched US$2.6b Last Week, Benefiting Both Retail Investors Who Own 45% as Well as Institutions

C3.ai, Inc.'s (NYSE:AI) Market Cap Touched US$2.6b Last Week, Benefiting Both Retail Investors Who Own 45% as Well as Institutions

C3.ai, Inc. 's(紐約證券交易所代碼:AI)上週市值觸及26億美元,這使持有45%的散戶投資者和機構都受益
Simply Wall St ·  04/23 07:14

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over C3.ai by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 25 shareholders own 47% of the company
  • Insiders own 11% of C3.ai
  • 散戶投資者對 C3.ai 的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 前 25 名股東擁有公司 47% 的股份
  • 內部人士擁有 C3.ai 11% 的股份

If you want to know who really controls C3.ai, Inc. (NYSE:AI), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 45% to be precise, is retail investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了 C3.ai, Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:AI),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。持有該公司股份最多的集團是散戶投資者,準確地說約爲45%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Retail investors gained the most after market cap touched US$2.6b last week, while institutions who own 42% also benefitted.

上週市值觸及26億美元后,散戶投資者漲幅最大,而持有42%的機構也從中受益。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about C3.ai.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於 C3.ai 的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:AI Ownership Breakdown April 23rd 2024
紐約證券交易所:人工智能所有權明細 2024年4月23日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About C3.ai?

關於 C3.ai,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that C3.ai does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of C3.ai, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,C3.ai 確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們有時也會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看 C3.ai 過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:AI Earnings and Revenue Growth April 23rd 2024
紐約證券交易所:人工智能收益和收入增長 2024年4月23日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in C3.ai. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 8.5% of shares outstanding. With 7.8% and 5.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, Thomas Siebel and BlackRock, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. Thomas Siebel, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

對沖基金在 C3.ai 中的股票不多。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是Vanguard Group, Inc.,其已發行股份爲8.5%。托馬斯·西貝爾和貝萊德公司分別擁有7.8%和5.5%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。第二大股東托馬斯·西貝爾也恰好擁有首席執行官的頭銜。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

深入研究我們的所有權數據表明,前25名股東總共持有不到登記冊的一半,這表明一大批小股東沒有單一股東佔多數。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of C3.ai

C3.ai 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of C3.ai, Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$288m stake in this US$2.6b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

看來內部人士擁有 C3.ai, Inc. 的很大一部分股份。有趣的是,內部人士在這項26億美元的業務中擁有2.88億美元的大量股份。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您不妨訪問這張顯示內部人士近期交易的免費圖表。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 45% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司45%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以使政策決定對他們有利,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand C3.ai better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that C3.ai is showing 4 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those doesn't sit too well with us...

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是爲了更好地理解 C3.ai,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意,C3.ai 在我們的投資分析中顯示了 4 個警告信號,其中 1 個對我們來說不太合適...

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論