share_log

Shanghai Bright Power Semiconductor Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688368) Largest Shareholder, CEO Liqiang Hu Sees Holdings Value Fall by 8.5% Following Recent Drop

Shanghai Bright Power Semiconductor Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688368) Largest Shareholder, CEO Liqiang Hu Sees Holdings Value Fall by 8.5% Following Recent Drop

上海光明功率半導體有限公司s (SHSE: 688368) 最大股東、首席執行官胡立強認爲,繼最近下跌之後,持股價值下降8.5%
Simply Wall St ·  04/21 21:31

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant insider control over Shanghai Bright Power Semiconductor implies vested interests in company growth
  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 63% ownership
  • 21% of Shanghai Bright Power Semiconductor is held by Institutions
  • 對上海光明功率半導體的重大內部控制意味着公司增長中的既得利益
  • 共有3名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲63%
  • 上海光明功率半導體 21% 的股份由機構持有

Every investor in Shanghai Bright Power Semiconductor Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688368) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 47% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

上海光明功率半導體有限公司(SHSE: 688368)的每位投資者都應了解最強大的股東群體。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有47%所有權的個人內部人士。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。

And following last week's 8.5% decline in share price, insiders suffered the most losses.

繼上週股價下跌8.5%之後,內部人士遭受的損失最大。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Shanghai Bright Power Semiconductor.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於上海光明功率半導體的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:688368 Ownership Breakdown April 22nd 2024
SHSE: 688368 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 22 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai Bright Power Semiconductor?

關於上海光明功率半導體,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Shanghai Bright Power Semiconductor does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Shanghai Bright Power Semiconductor, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,上海光明半導體確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看上海光明功率半導體過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:688368 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 22nd 2024
SHSE: 688368 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 22 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Shanghai Bright Power Semiconductor. The company's CEO Liqiang Hu is the largest shareholder with 24% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 22% and 16% of the stock.

對沖基金在上海光明功率半導體的股份不多。該公司首席執行官胡立強是最大股東,已發行股份爲24%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約22%和16%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

在進一步挖掘之後,我們發現前三名股東共同控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着他們擁有影響公司決策的巨大權力。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。分析師對該股的報道很少,但報道不多。因此,它還有獲得更多報道的餘地。

Insider Ownership Of Shanghai Bright Power Semiconductor

上海光明功率半導體的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Shanghai Bright Power Semiconductor Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥1.7b worth of shares in the CN¥3.7b company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

看來內部人士擁有上海光明功率半導體有限公司的很大一部分股份。內部人士擁有這家37億元人民幣公司價值17億元人民幣的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有大量股份。你可以點擊這裏查看他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 16% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司16%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 16%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有該公司16%的股份。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司感興趣,則應在年度報告中披露。私營公司也可能對公司有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他更爲重要的因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜歡更深入地了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以在這張詳細圖表中找到歷史收入和收入。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論