share_log

Institutions Along With Individual Investors Who Hold Considerable Shares InTellgen Corporation (SZSE:300642) Come Under Pressure; Lose 17% of Holdings Value

Institutions Along With Individual Investors Who Hold Considerable Shares InTellgen Corporation (SZSE:300642) Come Under Pressure; Lose 17% of Holdings Value

持有大量股票的機構及個人投資者面臨壓力;損失持股價值的17%
Simply Wall St ·  04/17 02:35

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over Tellgen by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 8 shareholders own 52% of the company
  • Insiders own 20% of Tellgen
  • 個人投資者對Tellgen的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 前8名股東擁有公司52%的股份
  • 內部人士擁有Tellgen20%的股份

Every investor in Tellgen Corporation (SZSE:300642) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 43% to be precise, is individual investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Tellgen Corporation(深圳證券交易所代碼:300642)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。持有公司股份最多的集團是個人投資者,準確地說約爲43%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

While institutions who own 27% came under pressure after market cap dropped to CN¥2.1b last week,individual investors took the most losses.

儘管上週市值跌至21億元人民幣後,持有27%的機構承受了壓力,但個人投資者遭受的損失最大。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Tellgen.

在下圖中,我們放大了Tellgen的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:300642 Ownership Breakdown April 17th 2024
SZSE: 300642 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 17 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Tellgen?

關於Tellgen,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

Tellgen already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Tellgen's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Tellgen已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Tellgen的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:300642 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 17th 2024
SZSE: 300642 2024年4月17日收益和收入增長

Tellgen is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Jian Er Yao with 20% of shares outstanding. With 7.4% and 5.1% of the shares outstanding respectively, Lingfei Group Co., Ltd. and UBS Asset Management AG are the second and third largest shareholders.

Tellgen 不歸對沖基金所有。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大股東是首席執行官姚健兒,其已發行股份的20%。凌飛集團有限公司和瑞銀資產管理股份公司分別擁有7.4%和5.1%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。

We also observed that the top 8 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前8名股東佔股票登記冊的一半以上,少數規模較小的股東可以在一定程度上平衡大股東的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。我們目前沒有收到分析師對該股的任何報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Tellgen

Tellgen 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Tellgen Corporation. Insiders own CN¥423m worth of shares in the CN¥2.1b company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

內部人士似乎擁有Tellgen公司的很大一部分股份。內部人士擁有這家21億元人民幣公司價值4.23億元人民幣的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有大量股份。你可以點擊這裏查看他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 43% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Tellgen. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Tellgen擁有43%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對Tellgen有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 9.4%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有公司9.4%的股份。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司有興趣,則應在年度報告中予以披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Tellgen better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Tellgen , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解Tellgen,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經向Tellgen確定了兩個警告信號,了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

當然,這可能不是最值得買入的股票。因此,您可能希望看到我們免費收集的具有良好財務狀況的有趣潛在客戶。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論