share_log

In the Wake of Radware Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:RDWR) Latest US$55m Market Cap Drop, Institutional Owners May Be Forced to Take Severe Actions

In the Wake of Radware Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:RDWR) Latest US$55m Market Cap Drop, Institutional Owners May Be Forced to Take Severe Actions

在 Radware Ltd. 之後”s(納斯達克股票代碼:RDWR)最新市值下降了5500萬美元,機構所有者可能被迫採取嚴厲行動
Simply Wall St ·  04/16 07:53

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Radware's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 高機構所有權意味着Radware的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 共有7名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲50%
  • 所有權研究以及分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票的機會

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Radware Ltd. (NASDAQ:RDWR), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 68% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制了Radware Ltd.(納斯達克股票代碼:RDWR),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有68%所有權的機構。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And so it follows that institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$695m last week after a 7.4% drop in the share price. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 23% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. Hence, if weakness in Radware's share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.

因此,上週該公司的市值在股價下跌7.4%後跌至6.95億美元,因此機構投資者是受影響最大的群體。最近的虧損加上股東一年的虧損23%,可能不適合這群投資者。機構或 “流動性提供者” 控制着大量資金,因此,這些類型的投資者通常對股價走勢有很大的影響力。因此,如果Radware股價持續疲軟,機構投資者可能會感到不得不出售該股票,這對於個人投資者來說可能並不理想。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Radware.

在下圖中,我們放大了Radware的不同所有權組。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:RDWR Ownership Breakdown April 16th 2024
納斯達克GS:RDWR 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 16 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Radware?

關於Radware,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

We can see that Radware does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Radware, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,Radware確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下Radware過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:RDWR Earnings and Revenue Growth April 16th 2024
納斯達克GS:RDWR 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 16 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Our data indicates that hedge funds own 9.8% of Radware. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. First Trust Advisors LP is currently the largest shareholder, with 10% of shares outstanding. With 9.8% and 8.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, Senvest Management, LLC and Morgan Stanley, Investment Banking and Brokerage Investments are the second and third largest shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Roy Zisapel directly holds 3.7% of the total shares outstanding.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。我們的數據表明,對沖基金擁有Radware9.8%的股份。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可以非常活躍和活躍。許多人正在尋找推動股價上漲的中期催化劑。First Trust Advisors LP目前是最大股東,已發行股份的10%。Senvest Management, LLC和摩根士丹利、投資銀行和經紀投資分別佔已發行股份的9.8%和8.5%,是第二和第三大股東。此外,該公司首席執行官羅伊·齊薩佩爾直接持有已發行股份總額的3.7%。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

經過進一步檢查,我們發現公司一半以上的股份由前7名股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被較小的股東所平衡。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Radware

Radware 的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行董事會成員的情況並不少見,特別是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Radware Ltd.. In their own names, insiders own US$25m worth of stock in the US$695m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有Radware Ltd的股份。內部人士以自己的名義擁有這家價值6.95億美元的公司價值2500萬美元的股票。有人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。但是可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 11% stake in Radware. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Radware11%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 7.3%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有公司7.3%的股份。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過控股私營公司而對上市公司擁有權益,而不是以個人身份擁有權益。儘管很難得出任何寬泛的結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Radware better, we need to consider many other factors.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解Radware,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我一直喜歡查看收入增長的歷史。您也可以,通過訪問此詳細圖表中的這張免費的歷史收入和收益圖表。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論