share_log

Institutional Investors May Overlook Liquidia Corporation's (NASDAQ:LQDA) Recent US$134m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive

Institutional Investors May Overlook Liquidia Corporation's (NASDAQ:LQDA) Recent US$134m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive

由於長期收益仍然樂觀,機構投資者可能會忽略Liquidia Corporation(納斯達克股票代碼:LQDA)最近1.34億美元的市值下跌
Simply Wall St ·  04/14 09:11

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Liquidia implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 機構在Liquidia的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 共有9名投資者擁有該公司的多數股權,擁有52%的所有權
  • 業內人士最近一直在拋售

If you want to know who really controls Liquidia Corporation (NASDAQ:LQDA), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 38% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着Liquidia Corporation(納斯達克股票代碼:LQDA),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。機構擁有38%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$134m last week. However, the 106% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

上週該公司的市值下降了1.34億美元后,機構投資者遭受了最大的損失。但是,106%的股東一年回報率可能減輕了打擊。但是,我們假設他們將來會注意弱點。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Liquidia, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Liquidia的每種所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:LQDA Ownership Breakdown April 14th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:LQDA 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 14 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Liquidia?

關於Liquidia,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

Liquidia already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Liquidia, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Liquidia已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下Liquidia過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:LQDA Earnings and Revenue Growth April 14th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:LQDA 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 14 日

It looks like hedge funds own 14% of Liquidia shares. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. The company's largest shareholder is Caligan Partners, LP, with ownership of 14%. Legend Aggregator Advisors, LLC is the second largest shareholder owning 9.4% of common stock, and Paul Manning holds about 7.6% of the company stock. Paul Manning, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors. Additionally, the company's CEO Roger Jeffs directly holds 2.6% of the total shares outstanding.

看來對沖基金擁有Liquidia14%的股份。這引起了我的注意,因爲對沖基金有時會試圖影響管理層,或者帶來能夠爲股東創造短期價值的變革。該公司的最大股東是Caligan Partners, LP,其所有權爲14%。Legend Aggregator Advisors, LLC是第二大股東,擁有9.4%的普通股,保羅·曼寧持有該公司約7.6%的股份。第三大股東保羅·曼寧也恰好擁有董事會成員的頭銜。此外,該公司首席執行官羅傑夫斯直接持有已發行股份總額的2.6%。

We also observed that the top 9 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前9名股東佔股票登記冊的一半以上,少數規模較小的股東可以在一定程度上平衡大股東的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Liquidia

Liquidia 的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Liquidia Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.1b, and insiders have US$119m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有Liquidia公司合理比例的股份。它的市值僅爲11億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值1.19億美元的股票。這非常重要。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 28% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Liquidia. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

擁有28%的所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對Liquidia有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 9.5%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的9.5%。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司有興趣,則應在年度報告中予以披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Liquidia better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Liquidia that you should be aware of before investing here.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解Liquidia,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們發現了Liquidia的兩個警告信號,在這裏投資之前,您應該注意這些信號。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論