share_log

John Reed Arhaus, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ARHS) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 4.9%last Week

John Reed Arhaus, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ARHS) CEO Is the Most Bullish Insider, and Their Stock Value Gained 4.9%last Week

John Reed Arhaus, Inc. 's(納斯達克股票代碼:ARHS)首席執行官是最看漲的內部人士,上週他們的股票價值上漲了4.9%
Simply Wall St ·  04/09 09:43

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Arhaus' significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • 58% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • Institutions own 26% of Arhaus
  • Arhaus 的重大內部所有權表明公司擴張有固有的利益
  • 58% 的業務由前 2 名股東持有
  • 機構擁有 Arhaus 26% 的股份

Every investor in Arhaus, Inc. (NASDAQ:ARHS) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 34% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Arhaus, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:ARHS)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,個別內部人士擁有公司的大部分股份,所有權爲34%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。

As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit US$2.2b market cap following a 4.9% gain in the stock.

結果,內部人士上週得分最高,該公司的市值在股價上漲4.9%後達到22億美元。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Arhaus, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Arhaus的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:ARHS Ownership Breakdown April 9th 2024
納斯達克GS:ARHS 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 9 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Arhaus?

關於Arhaus,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

Arhaus already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Arhaus' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Arhaus已經在股份登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Arhaus的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:ARHS Earnings and Revenue Growth April 9th 2024
納斯達克GS:ARHS 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 9 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Arhaus. With a 32% stake, CEO John Reed is the largest shareholder. The 2018 Reed Dynasty Trust is the second largest shareholder owning 26% of common stock, and The Reed 2013 Generation Skipping Trust holds about 4.0% of the company stock.

對沖基金在Arhaus的股份不多。首席執行官約翰·裏德持有32%的股份,是最大股東。2018年裏德王朝信託基金是第二大股東,擁有26%的普通股,而裏德2013年一代跳躍信託基金持有該公司約4.0%的股份。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 58% stake.

對股東登記處的更詳細研究表明,兩位最大股東通過其58%的股份擁有公司的大量所有權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Arhaus

Arhaus 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Arhaus, Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$740m stake in this US$2.2b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有Arhaus, Inc.合理比例的股份。有趣的是,內部人士在這項22億美元的業務中擁有7.4億美元的大量股份。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 10% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司10%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 30%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們的數據表明,私營公司持有該公司30%的股份。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過持有私營公司而不是以個人身份對上市公司感興趣。雖然很難得出任何粗略的結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Arhaus better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Arhaus you should be aware of.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解Arhaus,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。一個很好的例子:我們發現了 Arhaus 的 1 個警告標誌,你應該注意。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論