share_log

Both Retail Investors Who Control a Good Portion of TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ:WULF) Along With Institutions Must Be Dismayed After Last Week's 8.2% Decrease

Both Retail Investors Who Control a Good Portion of TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ:WULF) Along With Institutions Must Be Dismayed After Last Week's 8.2% Decrease

在上週下跌8.2%之後,控制TeraWulf Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:WULF)很大一部分股份的散戶投資者和機構都必須感到沮喪
Simply Wall St ·  04/09 09:31

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over TeraWulf by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 21 shareholders
  • Insiders own 21% of TeraWulf
  • 散戶投資者對TeraWulf的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 50% 的業務由前 21 名股東持有
  • 內部人士擁有 TeraWulf 21% 的股份

Every investor in TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ:WULF) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 43% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

TeraWulf Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:WULF)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。散戶投資者擁有該公司的最大股份,擁有43%的股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

While institutions, who own 22% shares weren't spared from last week's US$60m market cap drop, retail investors as a group suffered the maximum losses

儘管擁有22%股票的機構未能倖免於上週6000萬美元的市值下跌,但散戶投資者作爲一個整體遭受的損失最大

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about TeraWulf.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於TeraWulf的什麼。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:WULF Ownership Breakdown April 9th 2024
納斯達克公司:WULF 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 9 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About TeraWulf?

關於TeraWulf,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in TeraWulf. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at TeraWulf's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如您所見,機構投資者在TeraWulf中擁有相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看TeraWulf的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:WULF Earnings and Revenue Growth April 9th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:WULF 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 9 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in TeraWulf. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Paul Prager with 6.7% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Nazar Khan and Baystreet Capital Corp, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 6.6%. Interestingly, the second-largest shareholder, Nazar Khan is also Top Key Executive, again, pointing towards strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對TeraWulf進行有意義的投資。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大股東是首席執行官保羅·普拉格,其已發行股份佔6.7%。第二和第三大股東是納扎爾汗和Baystreet Capital Corp,持有與他們同等數量的股份,爲6.6%。有趣的是,第二大股東納扎爾·汗也是最高關鍵高管,這再次表明該公司最大的股東擁有強大的內部所有權。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 21 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔細觀察我們的所有權數據後發現,前21名股東的總所有權爲50%,這意味着沒有一個股東佔多數。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of TeraWulf

TeraWulf 的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of TeraWulf Inc.. Insiders own US$148m worth of shares in the US$710m company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

看來內部人士擁有TeraWulf Inc.的很大一部分股份。內部人士擁有這家價值7.1億美元的公司價值1.48億美元的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有大量股份。你可以點擊這裏查看他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 43% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司43%的股份,因此不容易被忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決定與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司的政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 14%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股票的14%。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過持有私人公司而非以個人身份持有上市公司的權益。儘管很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個有待進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - TeraWulf has 3 warning signs (and 2 which shouldn't be ignored) we think you should know about.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。以風險爲例-TeraWulf 有 3 個警告信號(其中 2 個不容忽視),我們認爲你應該知道。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論