share_log

Yeahka Limited's (HKG:9923) Stock Price Dropped 9.2% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy

Yeahka Limited's (HKG:9923) Stock Price Dropped 9.2% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy

Yeahka Limited(HKG: 9923)股價上週下跌9.2%;私營公司不會高興
Simply Wall St ·  04/08 19:21

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in Yeahka indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 56% ownership
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 私營公司在Yeahka擁有大量所有權,這表明它們在管理和業務戰略方面集體擁有更大的發言權
  • 共有3名投資者擁有該公司的多數股權,擁有56%的所有權
  • 分析師的預測以及所有權數據可以使人們對企業前景有深刻的了解

If you want to know who really controls Yeahka Limited (HKG:9923), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 56% to be precise, is private companies. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正控制着Yeahka Limited(HKG: 9923),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。持有該公司股份最多的集團是私營公司,準確地說約爲56%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

And last week, private companies endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 9.2%.

上週,私營公司遭受了最大的損失,股價下跌了9.2%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Yeahka.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Yeahka的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:9923 Ownership Breakdown April 8th 2024
SEHK: 9923 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 8 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Yeahka?

關於Yeahka,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

Yeahka already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Yeahka's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Yeahka已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Yeahka的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:9923 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 8th 2024
SEHK: 9923 2024 年 4 月 8 日收益和收入增長

Yeahka is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Creative Brocade International Limited with 37% of shares outstanding. Yeah Talent Holding Limited is the second largest shareholder owning 12% of common stock, and Headline holds about 7.2% of the company stock.

Yeahka不歸對沖基金所有。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是Creative Brocade International Limited,已發行股份的37%。Yeah Talent Holding Limited是第二大股東,擁有12%的普通股,Headline持有公司約7.2%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

在進一步挖掘之後,我們發現前三名股東共同控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着他們擁有影響公司決策的巨大權力。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Yeahka

Yeahka 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Yeahka Limited in their own names. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. It seems the board members have no more than HK$44m worth of shares in the HK$4.7b company. We generally like to see a board more invested. However it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的數據表明,內部人士以自己的名義擁有Yeahka Limited不到1%的股份。但是,他們可能會通過我們尚未採用的公司結構獲得間接利益。看來董事會成員在這家47億港元的公司中持有的股份不超過4400萬港元。我們通常希望看到董事會投入更多資金。但是,可能值得檢查這些內部人士是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 21% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司21%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With a stake of 7.2%, private equity firms could influence the Yeahka board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司持有7.2%的股份,可能會影響Yeahka董事會。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲私募股權有時是追究管理層責任的激進分子。但是其他時候,私募股權在公司上市後正在售罄。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 56%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的56%。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司有興趣,則應在年度報告中披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

It appears to us that public companies own 7.0% of Yeahka. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

在我們看來,上市公司擁有Yeahka7.0%的股份。很難肯定地說,但這表明它們將商業利益交織在一起。這可能是一個戰略利害關係,因此值得關注這個領域的所有權變動。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Yeahka has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。以風險爲例-Yeahka 有 2 個警告信號,我們認爲你應該注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論