share_log

While Institutions Own 33% of Jardine Matheson Holdings Limited (SGX:J36), Retail Investors Are Its Largest Shareholders With 47% Ownership

While Institutions Own 33% of Jardine Matheson Holdings Limited (SGX:J36), Retail Investors Are Its Largest Shareholders With 47% Ownership

雖然機構擁有怡和控股有限公司(新加坡證券交易所股票代碼:J36)33%的股份,但散戶投資者是其最大股東,擁有47%的所有權
Simply Wall St ·  04/03 19:18

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • The considerable ownership by retail investors in Jardine Matheson Holdings indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 22 shareholders
  • Institutions own 33% of Jardine Matheson Holdings
  • 散戶投資者對怡和控股的大量所有權表明,他們在管理和業務戰略方面共同擁有更大的發言權
  • 50% 的業務由前 22 名股東持有
  • 機構擁有怡和控股33%的股份

Every investor in Jardine Matheson Holdings Limited (SGX:J36) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 47% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

怡和控股有限公司(新加坡證券交易所股票代碼:J36)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,散戶投資者擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲47%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Institutions, on the other hand, account for 33% of the company's stockholders. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time.

另一方面,機構佔公司股東的33%。一般而言,隨着公司的發展,機構將增加其所有權。相反,內部人士通常會隨着時間的推移減少其所有權。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Jardine Matheson Holdings.

在下圖中,我們放大了怡和控股的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
SGX:J36 Ownership Breakdown April 3rd 2024
新加坡證券交易所:J36 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 3 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Jardine Matheson Holdings?

關於怡和控股,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that Jardine Matheson Holdings does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Jardine Matheson Holdings' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,怡和控股確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看怡和控股的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SGX:J36 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 3rd 2024
新加坡證券交易所:J36 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 3 日

Jardine Matheson Holdings is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Butterfield Asset Management Ltd., with ownership of 13%. With 13% and 5.1% of the shares outstanding respectively, 1947 Trust and First Eagle Investment Management, LLC are the second and third largest shareholders.

怡和控股不歸對沖基金所有。該公司的最大股東是巴特菲爾德資產管理有限公司,所有權爲13%。1947年信託和第一鷹投資管理有限責任公司分別擁有13%和5.1%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 22 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

查看股東登記處,我們可以看到50%的所有權由前22名股東控制,這意味着沒有一個股東在所有權中擁有多數權益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Jardine Matheson Holdings

怡和控股的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Jardine Matheson Holdings Limited. Insiders own US$741m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有怡和控股有限公司的股份。內部人士擁有價值7.41億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 47% stake in Jardine Matheson Holdings. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有怡和控股47%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 13%, of the Jardine Matheson Holdings stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

私人公司似乎擁有怡和控股13%的股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過一家獨立的私人公司對上市公司的股份擁有權益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Jardine Matheson Holdings has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。以風險爲例——怡和控股有兩個警告信號,我們認爲你應該注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論