share_log

Institutional Investors Own a Significant Stake of 41% in Metals Acquisition Limited (NYSE:MTAL)

Institutional Investors Own a Significant Stake of 41% in Metals Acquisition Limited (NYSE:MTAL)

機構投資者擁有金屬收購有限公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:MTAL)41%的大量股份
Simply Wall St ·  04/03 08:49

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Metals Acquisition's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 6 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 高機構所有權意味着Metals Acquisition的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 共有6位投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%
  • 所有權研究以及分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票的機會

A look at the shareholders of Metals Acquisition Limited (NYSE:MTAL) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 41% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看金屬收購有限公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:MTAL)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。機構擁有41%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

鑑於其可支配的資金和研究能力巨大,機構所有權往往具有很大的份量,對於個人投資者而言尤其如此。因此,投資於公司的機構資金中有很大一部分通常是對公司未來的巨大信任票。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Metals Acquisition.

在下圖中,我們放大了金屬收購的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:MTAL Ownership Breakdown April 3rd 2024
紐約證券交易所:MTAL 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 3 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Metals Acquisition?

關於金屬收購,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Metals Acquisition. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Metals Acquisition's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如您所見,機構投資者在金屬收購中擁有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到金屬收購的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事中總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:MTAL Earnings and Revenue Growth April 3rd 2024
紐約證券交易所:MTAL 收益和收入增長 2024 年 4 月 3 日

It would appear that 8.6% of Metals Acquisition shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Glencore plc with 14% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 9.1% of common stock, and Fourth Sail Capital LP holds about 8.6% of the company stock. Furthermore, CEO Michael James McMullen is the owner of 1.9% of the company's shares.

看來8.6%的金屬收購股票由對沖基金控制。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可以非常活躍和活躍。許多人正在尋找推動股價上漲的中期催化劑。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是嘉能可集團,已發行股份的14%。貝萊德公司是第二大股東,擁有9.1%的普通股,Fourth Sail Capital LP持有該公司約8.6%的股份。此外,首席執行官邁克爾·詹姆斯·麥克馬倫是該公司1.9%股份的所有者。

We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前六名股東佔股票登記冊的一半以上,少數規模較小的股東可以在一定程度上平衡大股東的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Metals Acquisition

金屬收購的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行董事會成員的情況並不少見,特別是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Metals Acquisition Limited. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$20m worth of the US$902m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

股東們可能會有興趣得知內部人士擁有金屬收購有限公司的股份。作爲個人,內部人士共同擁有這家價值9.02億美元的公司價值2000萬美元。有人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。但是,可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in Metals Acquisition. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有金屬收購28%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

It appears to us that public companies own 20% of Metals Acquisition. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

在我們看來,上市公司擁有金屬收購的20%。這可能是戰略利益,兩家公司可能有相關的商業利益。可能是他們已經消失了。這一裁定可能值得進一步調查。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Metals Acquisition better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Metals Acquisition .

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解金屬收購,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,你應該注意我們在金屬收購中發現的1個警告信號。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論